Judge strikes down violent-game law

PowerballWinner said:
So Gato Solo according to you a game company is not at fault if it manufactures a game that is about doing a shooting of fictional high school students. And if a person (who may be a teenager under 18 or 18 or 19 or above 19) plays that game and decides to shoot real life high school students, then the video game company should not be sued/stopped from producing the game? If they shouldn't be sued/stopped, then why not?



No. the person who carries out the actions of shooting the fucking school are to blame. and Id blame other factors not just the media. and once again I would wonder why noone noticed anything strange and where the hell parents or other officals were
 
Back
Top