Kill her now

Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Mental illness. So what.

Associated Press

November 8, 2004


BRIDGEPORT, Conn. -- A judge set bond at $250,000 on Monday for a Stratford woman accused of having a sexual relationship with an 8-year-old boy.

Tammy Imre, 29, of Stratford is accused of first-degree sexual assault, fourth-degree sexual assault and risk of injury to a minor.

Imre was shackled for the brief court appearance, and did not say anything.

The divorced mother of a 7-year-old girl, is accused of assaulting her daughter's playmate.

An investigation began in September, after the boy's mother discovered a letter Imre had written her son, police said.

In the letter, police said Imre told the boy that she doesn't "want anyone but you. Now tomorrow it's supposed to rain, you can come over we can (you know what)."

When confronted, police said Imre acknowledged to having sexual relations with the boy. Imre told investigators she considers the 8-year-old youngster her boyfriend and that she plans to marry him someday, police said.

If convicted, Imre could serve more than 20 years in prison.


Copyright © 2004, The Associated Press
Click to expand...
 
There is a term for this. It is called pedophilia.

I'm a probation/parole officer, and have been for 6+ years. Prior to that I was a mental health therapist. I have dealt with my share of pedophiles. They are pretty much unrepentant, "incurable", and extremely manipulative people. They can explain away their atrocious acts with the wave of a hand and manage to blame anyone but themselves for what they do. Most are male. Most.

I agree. It's sickening and borders on enraging. I would suggest these people get help. I ain't found any yet that is reliable. It's a sad commentary on our world, but to my knowledge there is no way to control these people short of physical or chemical castration or confinement. Confinement is expensive; castration is controversial...the whole "human rights" thing.

Personally, I wouldn't bitch about the cost of keeping them locked up.
 
Since pedophilia is incurable & has a very high rate of recidivism, why not assume they have rescinded their human rights.
 
Gonz said:
Since pedophilia is incurable & has a very high rate of recidivism, why not assume they have rescinded their human rights.
Click to expand...

Far be it from little ol' me to say that sometimes that doesn't happen when no one is looking...
 
Gonz said:
Since pedophilia is incurable & has a very high rate of recidivism, why not assume they have rescinded their human rights.
Click to expand...

In order to be concerned with human rights violations, the first criteria would be that one is talking about a human. I don't think pedofiles qualify, so problem solved. Gimme the scissors, don't bother with the sharpening, and I'll get right on that *snip snip*
 
This bites to say the least, over here not long ago we had a female swimming instructor having sex with a male pupil of hers aged about 12 if memory recalls straight. The affair had been going on for over a year, she got found out, a slap on the wrist ensued for her with loss of swimming rights. The human outcry was and still is ongoing, a man in this position is as is previously mentioned here a paedophile and would spend a lenghty jail term, a woman accused of the same actions gets off scott free because of a loophole in the law.
They should all be de-sexed, jailed then put to death.
 
Anyone else actually wondering about the technicalities of female adult male child paedophilia.... or am I really really alone in my sickness.

But regardless of that... I find it all extremely disgusting and just plain wrong *shudder*
 
ClaireBear said:
Anyone else actually wondering about the technicalities of female adult male child paedophilia.... or am I really really alone in my sickness.

But regardless of that... I find it all extremely disgusting and just plain wrong *shudder*
Click to expand...

Shouldn't be any technicalities. Wrong is wrong. If a man that age has sex with a girl that age, he gets 20 years. Period. There is no excuse for it.
 
In my job I have supervised a couple of female sex offenders, both for statutory rape. One victim was a 16 year old boy (the woman was 24). The other was a little more bizarre.

She was 40ish, and she "entertained" several neighborhood boys at different times ranging in age from 12 to 17. On at least one occasion, there were 5 boys at once. She also had a 16 year old daughter, very attractive, and the mother would meet men online for sex. The deal was, they could have her daughter after they finished with her. She contracted one of these men to kill her husband also. They almost succeeded.

The daughter was well on her way to becoming as sick as her mother. She openly talked about having several men at once, being filmed, etc. She seemed to enjoy it. Maybe she enjoyed the attention it brought her, I dunno. When themother was sentenced, the daughter was not allowed to remain in her father's custody for fear that she was in on the plot to kill him. She was sent to foster care. I'm sure that worked out well...

The vast majority of convicted sex offenders are male. Female sex offenders are a rarity. Females who are convicted of sex offenses are by and large convicted of statutory rape, or sex with minors. Usually the boys are in their late teens, but not always. Some people argue that these boys are not victims in the same sense that a teenage girl would be. I personally feel that they are. I also think it makes them more likely to try and enforce their will on girls their own age or younger, thus creating new victims.
 
Gato is right in his statement of wrong is wrong.Male and female paedophelia is the same.


I wonder about the 16 year old. I wonder if her mother reinforced it to make her enjoy it. But she might have on her own or a combination of things. That is a sad story. Fucking slut mom.
 
Gato_Solo said:
Shouldn't be any technicalities. Wrong is wrong. If a man that age has sex with a girl that age, he gets 20 years. Period. There is no excuse for it.
Click to expand...

No I don't mean that... :blush:

I mean it must be a Hell of a lot "physically" easier for a male to force himself on a young girl... by technicalities I was meaning technicalities... as in "How the... :confused: "

Told you... I must be either sick or I'm even more sheltered than I thought! :D

I totally agree that both male and female paedophiles should receive the same type and length of punishment
 
ClaireBear said:
No I don't mean that... :blush:

I mean it must be a Hell of a lot "physically" easier for a male to force himself on a young girl... by technicalities I was meaning technicalities... as in "How the... :confused: "

Told you... I must be either sick or I'm even more sheltered than I thought! :D

I totally agree that both male and female paedophiles should receive the same type and length of punishment
Click to expand...


How? I think you'll find in most cases the male boy is more than likely "willing" to carry on with such actions.
Still doesnt make it right tho.
 
staffrodore said:
How? I think you'll find in most cases the male boy is more than likely "willing" to carry on with such actions.
Still doesnt make it right tho.
Click to expand...

But in this instance... it was the playmate of her 7 year old daughter so we'd probably be talking a child of similar age...

I'd imagine, like you suggest, that older boys early/mid teens may be "willing" and physically equipt to... em... well... :blush: make it.. er "worthwhile" for the sicko but a child of that age....
 
It's still possible, boys as young as ten, or even ealier are capable of fathering a child, I know when I was 7-8 things where happening to my body (which I thouroughly enjoyed)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top