Let the party begin
- Thread starter Gonz
- Start date
Again, why?
He's there on recess because the dems were playng politics by filibustering his vote so Bush played politics by bypassing them.
spike
New Member
He's there to further the Bush agenda, alienate our allies, and try and start a war with Iran. An agenda American have made clear they don't want.
More on his record
http://www.stopbolton.org/record.html
Why do you think he's doing a good job?
He also made false statements on forms put to the Senate and it wasn't just the dems that made his nomination fail twice.
If you're saying Bush was just playing politics by bypassing Congress then they should play politics and oust the guy.
More on his record
http://www.stopbolton.org/record.html
Why do you think he's doing a good job?
He also made false statements on forms put to the Senate and it wasn't just the dems that made his nomination fail twice.
If you're saying Bush was just playing politics by bypassing Congress then they should play politics and oust the guy.
That fairly well sums it up.
There are also some threads that show what a great job he's doing.
spike
New Member
-Outraging developing countries, pushing his personal agenda, and destroying agreements
-Power grabbing instead of working for a strong institution capable of helping all
-Alienating nations with arrogance andinflammatory remarks
-Missing 34 of 35 meetings for the Human rights council
-Ignoring State Departments must have items
-Muddying policy on WMDs
-Promoting his personal views at the expense of US policy
-Undermining US efforts to find a peaceful solution with Iran to the point that Rice has to keep him out of negotiations and not even tell them they are happening.
You consider that a good job? We could pick a random person out of the phone book and have real good odds on getting a better person for the job.
No worries though. He'll be gone soon enough.
1)and the fragile agreement fell apart....stopping one more piece of international crap from taking over our life. Fragile agreements have a tendency to fall apart easily.
2)“Why shouldn’t we pay for what we want, instead of paying a bill for what we get?”...reasonable.
3)he inaccurately called sexual abuse and exploitation by peacekeepers – a serious but limited problem that the U.N. must address – a "rampant practice." ...so the UN is downplaying serious problems...once again & they got called on it. Good.
4)In the end, the U.S. rejected the Human Rights Council on Bolton’s recommendation and was joined by only four countries. Peter Maurer, the ambassador of Switzerland, characterized the American approach as “intransigent and maximalist.” The Swiss understand us. WHy can't you?
5)"I give them [India and Pakistan] credit – at least that what they did was consistent with the obligations they undertook. They never pretended that they had given up the pursuit of nuclear weapons. They never tried to tie what they were doing under a cloak of international legitimacy. They did it openly and they did it legitimately."...Say, where was he when India & Pakistan were developing WMDs? Oh, sorry, that was Bills watch.
ah, hell, I'm bored with this. Can't the UN just pack thier bags, move to Paris & not invite us to tag along & muddy the water?
2)“Why shouldn’t we pay for what we want, instead of paying a bill for what we get?”...reasonable.
3)he inaccurately called sexual abuse and exploitation by peacekeepers – a serious but limited problem that the U.N. must address – a "rampant practice." ...so the UN is downplaying serious problems...once again & they got called on it. Good.
4)In the end, the U.S. rejected the Human Rights Council on Bolton’s recommendation and was joined by only four countries. Peter Maurer, the ambassador of Switzerland, characterized the American approach as “intransigent and maximalist.” The Swiss understand us. WHy can't you?
5)"I give them [India and Pakistan] credit – at least that what they did was consistent with the obligations they undertook. They never pretended that they had given up the pursuit of nuclear weapons. They never tried to tie what they were doing under a cloak of international legitimacy. They did it openly and they did it legitimately."...Say, where was he when India & Pakistan were developing WMDs? Oh, sorry, that was Bills watch.
ah, hell, I'm bored with this. Can't the UN just pack thier bags, move to Paris & not invite us to tag along & muddy the water?
2minkey
bootlicker
hey it's MACHO to be like that. just ask chavez.
spike
New Member
Now that the lunatic is gone, somebody qualified can be put in place.