yeah, and you'd know, because you are the expert.
So anyone who speaks to any subject MUST be an expert or they are totally incredible. If they do not possess every single inkling of information they are incredible. One may not possess only a modicum of knowledge because in your all or nothing universe only "all" counts. That, of course, takes us back to your literalism.
so then you could tell me jim... what are the typical differences between the eye orbits on a typical chinese vs. a typical subsaharan west african?
I love how you take a simple, and truthful, statement on the basic racial makeup of a subset of humanity and turn it into an analysis of the makeup of the skull features of other people.
Figure it out yourself. There's a chart that even you should be able to figure out, complete with pictures.
http://www.theoryofuniverse.com/man/races/races-skulls.htm
http://racialreality.110mb.com/
As for me, I don't give a steaming pile of shit about the differences in the makeup of the orbital opening of the skull of anyone. I couldn't care less even if I grunted. It means nothing to me whatsoever.
I mention a simple fact, that Jews are considered Caucasoid -- not Negroid, Mongoloid, or Australoid -- and you regress to the nineteenth century. The fact is real. The fact is true. The fact is well known and documented in scientific circles. Thousands of papers and studies have been done on the subject.
How apropos, however, that you went immediately to an attempt to steer the discussion in the direction of the
differences in people. Something to be said about that, ya know.