North American Union??
- Thread starter Luis G
- Start date
Professur
Well-Known Member
Man, that must have felt good.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
24 hours is hardly runnning away (work interferes with proper board arguments sometimes)
Overtime?
bleedin ell - is that Valaru? sheesh, seems like a i know a few people on here. (hello!)
Gonz - teen father heh? There is a sketch on British tv (harry enfield i think) where their lovely nice son wakes up on his thirteenth birthday ...
...and emerges a whiny cantankerous lazy baseball cap wearing terror ... they eventually ended it some years later after his having first girl ...
...he re-emerges down the stairs to the breakfast table the next day in jumper and combed hair, as pleasant and helpful as ****!
)goodluck!
p.s. - it is NOT my advice to encourage your son to have underage sex - just cus the teenage years are taxing ye!
I don't know Southern- if my culture and heritage was under threat i'd fight back too.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
Still busy?
Tired but I'm re-reading the Confederate Constitution. Yep, still looks awfully familiar. Even this part
Say, Mr Jefferson, have you met Mr Madison?
What have we here?
Oh yea, states right, here & now, Jacky, right here & now
Article IV, Section3 Paragrapgh 3...
It's a (partial) re-write of the US Constitution.
where have I seen that before?
Say, Mr Jefferson, have you met Mr Madison?
What have we here?
Oh yea, states right, here & now, Jacky, right here & now
Looks like Federalism to me.
Article IV, Section3 Paragrapgh 3...
It's a (partial) re-write of the US Constitution.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
Marvy. Nice to see that you do read.
Now, the questions I asked...
Now, the questions I asked...
It's even less clear than before. It's clear that theConfederacy intended to maintain slavery, forever. It was NEVER written into Mr Madisons version.
No. I've made myself clear on how I think the flag of the confederate states representss treason against the United States.
Just as soon as I lose my sense of humor, sure. I don't tend to tell that kind of joke but one liners do sometimes fill the bill.
No. I'll also not slap people who make jokes about California or the midwest ot New England. Hell, I won't even end Mexican jokes.
They've never rolled at accents, unless they were simply bad impressions.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
So the discrimination and double standards continue.
Bravo.
Good to finally have it out in the open.
Bravo.
Good to finally have it out in the open.
If the confederacy was still a viable option, as in active, then double standard would apply. However, that matter was settled 135+ years ago.
Discrimination...it's no worse for southerners than for any other group that whines about it. You can't please all the people all the time.
Discrimination...it's no worse for southerners than for any other group that whines about it. You can't please all the people all the time.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
As you wish. Just nice to have your thoughts in print for when I will need them later.
Carry on. Continue to don't mind me/mine. Ain't changed nothin yet.
Carry on. Continue to don't mind me/mine. Ain't changed nothin yet.
SouthernN'Proud
Southern Discomfort
To return to the original intent of this thread,which I grazingly addressed earlier...
One part of my brain opposes it, as I am oh-so leary of political liasons of any sort.
Another, stronger part doesn't really give a damn though. It would only formalize what is already in place....we carry 80% of the load, just would no longer be totally sovereign in our decisions. Klinton and W have been busy giving away the farm for 14 years now, so what's it gonna matter if it becomes formal? Mexico already dictates immigration policy. Canada...sits and does...whatever it is they do...thaw I guess...maybe some other stuff...who knows?
So we put it on paper. Decriminalize immigration. Save a few thousand lives a year, lose a few million in tourism along the way...big deal. It would grant our agents some leeway to go into, say, Brazil and take a chunk out of the cocaine trade....like that's gonna ever happen.
Course, before long we'd have to standardize currency I suppose. Trade deficits would be written off too I guess. Once the economic indexes from Mexico get figured into our average, it'll create an entire new poverty line, making millions more eligible for the tax dollars and Social Security monies I pay. Neato. Let the handouts begin.
Yep. Union. It's always for the best.
Deo vindice.
One part of my brain opposes it, as I am oh-so leary of political liasons of any sort.
Another, stronger part doesn't really give a damn though. It would only formalize what is already in place....we carry 80% of the load, just would no longer be totally sovereign in our decisions. Klinton and W have been busy giving away the farm for 14 years now, so what's it gonna matter if it becomes formal? Mexico already dictates immigration policy. Canada...sits and does...whatever it is they do...thaw I guess...maybe some other stuff...who knows?
So we put it on paper. Decriminalize immigration. Save a few thousand lives a year, lose a few million in tourism along the way...big deal. It would grant our agents some leeway to go into, say, Brazil and take a chunk out of the cocaine trade....like that's gonna ever happen.
Course, before long we'd have to standardize currency I suppose. Trade deficits would be written off too I guess. Once the economic indexes from Mexico get figured into our average, it'll create an entire new poverty line, making millions more eligible for the tax dollars and Social Security monies I pay. Neato. Let the handouts begin.
Yep. Union. It's always for the best.
Deo vindice.
Gato_Solo
Out-freaking-standing OTC member
I never needed one in my entire adult life, except for the official government passport, until the EU. Before then, my ID card was enough. I've never needed one to travel to Canada.