Not a gay marriage thread

Professur

Well-Known Member
I'm looking for opinions. (as opposed to arguments)

Just how far do you think the "NEW GAY REGIME" is going to take us? And, perhaps more importantly, how far do you think they've taken us already? Is the GAY REGIME an entity of it's own, or a tentacle of a much older beast? Perhaps a seed planted in the sexual revolution of the '60s? Or even the post WWII consumerism? Or, could this movement actually trace it's roots all the way back to the american revolution?

Opinions, please. Argue them elsewere. Thank you.
 
I think the homosexual agenda is social engineering on a grand scale. It is the degradation of society in the name of progressiveness, the socialization of freedom in the name of diversity. They are taking the delicate moral-fabric from 5000 years of societal evolution, cutting the whole-cloth and making jump-suit out of it.



The homosexual agenda is dependant on the degradation and manipulation of the social structure in the quest of forced acceptance. The homosexual agenda is the leading edge and controlling force of the liberal movement that has reduced the scruples of the social norms in the name of progressive thinking.



Any private individual who expresses their view based on their values of right and wrong are labeled any number of terms, so one must comply under fear and speak the acceptable PC line or suffer social humilities for speaking their true beliefs.



Any professional entity that makes point of the facts will be attacked, sued, and have the might of lobby dropped on them; they will incur huge financial cost and well as be professionally smeared thru the mud and ostersized.



Fear of social and professional demonization is how the lobby controls those who dare to speak their principled values against them. You must accept and celebrate the lifestyle or you are condemned as homophobic, close minded, shallow, or a bigot.



Quite successfully they have made speaking your thoughts an act that will not be tolerated, they have become the “thought police” (can you say 1984).



The flamboyant and outrages behavior like gay-pride-parades etc. serve to widen the social spectrum to the left. This gives the illusion that the less flamboyant behavior of simple homosexuality is far more conservative then the outrageous expression that you see at these events. This social rebellion makes the typical everyday life of homosexuals appear to be more like the life of a typical heterosexual. There is now less of a moral difference as a normal homosexual does not behave like those “crazy” homosexuals on TV. Closing the moral gap.



Homosexuals began the big push in the political climate of the 70’s; the beginning of the liberal movement we see today. Homosexuals call themselves a “family” and have unduly and selectively promoted each other into positions of power and can now dictate policies inside many private institution and government offices. This has been the protocol of the agenda to build the Vanguard (ever read Lenin’s communist manifesto?).



Homosexuality has become a protected behavior that must be accepted as moral or you are crushed by the full power of the Vanguard. Most people that disagree with the morality of the lifestyle will tell you otherwise out of fear of being cast negatively in society.



The acceptance of homosexuals is dependant on the reduction of moral standards. If a behavior is not morally acceptable it will never be accepted or validated. Marriage has long been considered a positive moral attribute of a person’s character, divorce was seen as a blemish of ones moral character. The liberal need to excuse personal responsibility has changed the rules and made the process of divorce a simple no-fault process. The moral value of the rite marriage has been lowered which was just one step to lower the moral bar closer to the needs of the Vanguard.



The traditional family unit too must be reduced is stature and moral value so the bar can be met by the components of a homosexual relationship. Otherwise it would, be superior in stature and have a moral high ground over a homosexual relationship



In an attempt to raise the morality level of homosexuality they have made every effort to prove that it homosexuality is normal, natural, and prevalent in nature. The Vanguard has directed billions of dollars to the cause of proving the proclivity of the behaviors is normal and thus acceptable.. They have touted conclusive proof on many occasions only to have the proof shown to be biased or just plain wrong. There is no naturally reoccurring comparison in science to provide the validation that homosexuality is normal or natural when compared to heterosexuality. In fact science has volumes of data to show otherwise. True science is being squelched by the Vanguard.



In their selfish quest for validation and acceptance the very few have forced the majority to reduce their freedom to hold, protect, and express their individual morals and values.



We are heading to a socialist state of affairs where all in equities are leveled. We are being consumed by the agenda. To simply speak of morality or place judgment is equated to hatred. Opposing individual free thinking will be a threat to the Vanguard and not tolerated. Judicial legislation has been the key to subvert the will of the moral majority.



The moral decay of society is the cornerstone of which the new social construct is being built. Some things are just not acceptable in civilized society, yet we embrace these antisocial behaviors under the guise of tolerance and diversity. The unneighborly discourse and chaotic and world we have come to know is a direct result of unbridled tolerance, force acceptance, and lack of personal accountability.



Liberalism and the underlying socialism have the potential to wreak havoc on society as it always has in the past. Unless of course, ‘those who know’ how to execute it properly are in charge.





The moral fabric that has been woven with the living and dying experiences of thousands of generations is being forcefully rewoven with fibre that, time and time again, has not has not been able to pass the litmus test of natural evolution.





. . . Just my opinion.


 
There is no Gay Regime.....it is another minority who has gained acceptance in pop culture so it's eventual acceptance in society is forcasted.

English bitched when protestants wanted rights...

....People bitched when women wanted rights....

....People bitched when Black people wanted rights....

....People bitch when gay people want rights.....

see a trend...

It's funny how people claim gay marriages are tearing down the sacred tradition when they themselves have turned marriage to a joke these days.

Homosexuality has always been there but only now it is being accepted and I see that as a good thing.....people are changing and becoming more tolerant but unfortunetly most are just shutting their mouths to the whole thing in fear of being labeled "ignorant" and "narrowminded" which has always been the case in every change, I mean how many guys still think women should stay in the kicthen and that black people are the dredge of society.


Just like every social change the desire has always been there it is only the time that is right....a wise man once said "Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come".....


and it seems this idea's time has come.
 
Professur said:
I'm looking for opinions. (as opposed to arguments)

Just how far do you think the "NEW GAY REGIME" is going to take us? And, perhaps more importantly, how far do you think they've taken us already? Is the GAY REGIME an entity of it's own, or a tentacle of a much older beast? Perhaps a seed planted in the sexual revolution of the '60s? Or even the post WWII consumerism? Or, could this movement actually trace it's roots all the way back to the american revolution?

Opinions, please. Argue them elsewere. Thank you.
Gay Regime? Gay Regime. Ok.
 
IDLEchild said:
It's funny how people claim gay marriages are tearing down the sacred tradition when they themselves have turned marriage to a joke these days.


You'll get no argument from me there. But that's hardly the point of the thread, is it?
 
No, I think that people today have totally shit upon everything marriage is, and stands for if pretty well a documented fact now. Not much grey area left there.
 
Perhaps a different thread title would be appropos. "Gay regime" or "Gay agenda" or "Gay Gestapo" - with the current title acting as an asterixed rider to your first post?

I though that you'd be posting about Marriage in general as oppposed to gay-mariage. Imagine my surprise.

I'll have to ponder this one.
 
who is in the gay regime exactly? is this some canadian term im unfamiliar with? are there officers? and from this logic im assuming the current american regime is the heterosexual regime then?
 
GLAAD, ACT UP, Dykes on Bikes...there's a start if you really want to know who is on the list of homosexual agendizers.
 
Back
Top