ObamaCare revisited

catocom said:
that's your perception.
Click to expand...

No, it clearly was unsubstantiated since you didn't back it up with anything and it was clearly vague since it didn't refer to any specific effects and it was clearly complaining since it was negative.
 
you clearly don't seem to have a sense of what 'clearly' is.

there's a dangling participle for ya.:winkkiss:
 
No, I know exactly what clearly means.

Not backed up with facts = unsubstantiated.

Not referring to any specific effects = vague.

Negative comment about the subject = complaining.

What is it you think isn't clear?
 
catocom said:
I don't Have to do anything...
keep guessing
Click to expand...

Right, but if you make a statement without backing it up you're just throwing more unsubstantiated crap out there. If you can't back up your accusation then it's pretty empty.
 
Whatever cat, you said "your definitions are close, but the applications are incorrect." but now you refuse to elaborate. If you want just say things and not explain them that's weird.

It's like saying "you are wrong" and then not explaining why. Go ahead and talk about levels of fluids in glasses instead.
 
spike said:
It's idiotic though that these ridiculous sources like CNS would throw in nonsense fear mongering at the end though. Oh noez it symbolizes government takeover!@! No, it doesn't. It symbolizes that you'll be able to sign up for healthcare at multiple locations.
Click to expand...

Hey spike, it looks like he asked the question I've been driving at for months & the esteemed Sen Leahy didn't have an answer. In fatc, he specifically showed that he has no idea what authority he does have. I'd suggest Article 1 section 8.

Sen. Leahy: "We have plenty of authority. Are you saying there is no authority?"
Click to expand...

Yes, Senator, that is what we're saying. Fortunately, more & more of us are askign that very question.

Sen. Leahy: "Why would you say there is no authority? I mean, there’s no question there’s authority. Nobody questions that."
Click to expand...

Maybe there needs to be more questioning. Oh, there is.
 
Gonz said:
Hey spike, it looks like he asked the question I've been driving at for months & the esteemed Sen Leahy didn't have an answer. In fatc, he specifically showed that he has no idea what authority he does have. I'd suggest Article 1 section 8.



Yes, Senator, that is what we're saying. Fortunately, more & more of us are askign that very question.



Maybe there needs to be more questioning. Oh, there is.
Click to expand...
Seems that very question befuddled Pelosi also.

Seems Pelosi doesn't unnerstan' the COTUS either. :leghump:
 
wow stop and think for a second
how many other Americans would be able to answer
that very question without the least bit of hesitation

at one time there would be no question
now it really seems there people who don’t know the answer

"Are you serious?"
I'd say it's as serious as hell!

Makes you wonder what the near term future holds...
 
Winky said:
wow stop and think for a second
how many other Americans would be able to answer
that very question without the least bit of hesitation

at one time there would be no question
now it really seems there people who don’t know the answer

"Are you serious?"
I'd say it's as serious as hell!

Makes you wonder what the near term future holds...
Click to expand...

1st Amendment, then the 2nd.
 
Thomas Jeferson said:
To take from one because it is thought that his own industry and that of his father’s has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association -- the guarantee to every one of a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it
Click to expand...

Jefferson said:
A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.
Click to expand...

Jefferson said:
Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated
Click to expand...

John Adams said:
The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence
Click to expand...

Pelosi said:
Are you serious?
Click to expand...

Day & night
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top