Pentagon suspends war propaganda

Seems you don't have it straight at all. The Pentagon didn't do anybody's job, they mislead the public.

It is not the PENTAGONS job to keep the public informed. They release information that is helpful to troop morale.
 
Wes is a military analyst---->Wes speaks gov propaganda

Isn't that the way liberal theory goes?

No, how much clearer can this be. People posing as independent analysts who are not truthful about their actual role as Pentagon led "message force multipliers" are the problem.

Do you have some conservative theory about Wes relating to this or not?
 
It is not the PENTAGONS job to keep the public informed. They release information that is helpful to troop morale.

Right, so you disagree with Cerise. The Pentagon shouldn't be misleading the public like this by sending propaganda men posing as independent analysts.
 
Maybe you libs could file a class-action lawsuit against Boooosh and claim you've been traumatized since learning that the Penagon has briefed retired military analysts with information regarding activities in Iraq so the American public could hear something besides the usual MSM drivel of how evil, inept, and corrupt their country is.

Or maybe you could just change the frickin' tv channel to the one that features St. Wesley . :shrug:
 
Maybe you libs could file a class-action lawsuit against Boooosh and claim you've been traumatized since learning that the Penagon has briefed retired military analysts with information regarding activities in Iraq so the American public could hear something besides the usual MSM drivel of how evil, inept, and corrupt their country is.

Or maybe you could just change the frickin' tv channel to the one that features St. Wesley . :shrug:

It's entertaining to see you avoid the issue over and over because you can't defend it. Although you've made it clear that you are perfectly fine with the government misleading you. Can't say that I'm surprised.
 
You don't find it bizarre and hypocritical that the NYT wrote an article about "shaping coverage" when they spawned the term?

The topic is a non-issue. Nothing to defend.
 
just the fact that you thought of that suggests to me that you've been watching too much daytime TV.

"Are you suffering from the acute onset of paranoia in reaction to the policies, the presidency, the very existence of George W. Bush? Do you refuse to remove the Kerry/Edwards bumper sticker from your car? Do you insist that in 2000 voter irregularity in Florida gave that state to Bush? Do you believe that in 2004 voting machines in Ohio were tampered with by the RNC? Do you routinely use terms such as "dictator", "fascist", "monarchy" or "Generalissimo" when discussing George W. Bush?" :rofl3:
 
You don't find it bizarre and hypocritical that the NYT wrote an article about "shaping coverage" when they spawned the term?

The topic is a non-issue. Nothing to defend.

Fox news spawned the term.

But I'm mot surprised that the government lying to you is not a big deal to you. Pretty anti-American of you.
 
Back
Top