52% of the respondants gave him a D or worse. and you slobberheads call that a rousing success.
Actually, those H2Oboy considers as slobberheads would call that particular poll questionable as WSMV says: "we make no guarantees about the accuracy of the results"...
Since the poll is, by definition of WSMV, an "entertainment poll not conducted in a scientific fashion" there is good reason to question the results.
come to think i guess you would call it a success
Yes, it is a sucess of sorts because as one sorts through the various polls, the upshot of all other national polls tell a different story. A story of approval. The dates of the polls cited are from 04/21/09 through 04/25/09.
Rasmussen - 56%
Gallup - 63%
CBS/Times - 68%
ABC/Post - 69%
Fox - 62%
Marist College - 55%
i mean some of you cannot even differentiate between a score and a percentile.
The question asked by WSMV was; what grade would you give President Obama on his first 100 days in office.
Since the grades "A" through "F" were the benchmark, and the result posted as percentages based on the premise of what is passing. A "D" is passing and worth 1 credit hour according to Standards of the National University System ergo, the standard of a passing grade and the count of votes that determine the higher percentile have been established.
on your second trip through college, when youre thrilled to get a C because its so much better than your first try. and we wonder how this oatmeal head got elected
in a nation of idiots, its small wonder one got elected leader
For one thing, I have never received a grade lower than "B" in the second go-round. It is disappointing that someone who purports to be bright tries to denigrate others seeking higher education. It removes the mask of how the one making the judgement realistically views higher education while expressing their disdain of those efforts. At first thought that individual falls short in lucidity. But that has been proven already.
Permit me to rephrase the comment re: in a nation of idiots: In a nation of idiots that elected G.W. Bush.
One need not hold a baccalaureate degree to conclude that while the WSMV self-described non-scientific entertainment poll indicates 31% of respondents give a failing grade to President Obama's first 100 days in office is by comparison to six national polls, not representative of the national average and therefore, inaccurate. But this isn't nor should it be a surprise considering those who strive to seek such admitted non-scientific polling as proof their opinion is valid. Those who do are what slobberheads refer to as bottom feeders, a reference to the ones who pick shit with the birds in an effort to find one grain of previously digested but expelled as waste, morsel.
But it is really interesting to see it come full circle.
Perhaps the worse part is the simple truth the rest of us have to suffer with those limited and inaccurate observations gleaned from the manure pile.(sigh)
too bad the rest of us have to suffer through it