Racists calling people racist

SouthernN'Proud

SouthernN'Proud

Southern Discomfort
Man, this is crazy. A white lawmaker banned from the Black Caucus based on race, then accused by those banning him of being...you guessed it...a racist.

"I'm not but you are!"

No comment from me as to political party affiliation of those involved, it's as you'd expect.

So...who's wrong here? And why?
 
If this guy was simply trying to stir shit, he's in the wrong. OTOH, there shouldn't be any such thing as a black caucus, IMO. There surely isn't a white caucus. Can you imagine the outrage?
 
HomeLAN said:
If this guy was simply trying to stir shit, he's in the wrong. OTOH, there shouldn't be any such thing as a black caucus, IMO. There surely isn't a white caucus. Can you imagine the outrage?
Click to expand...
Sure there is, only in most states they call it the legislature.
 
Read a bit of his blog here and there.... Seems like an angry guy just looking for some attention is about all.... No short wonder why they called him a "strange man".
 
He needs to be more creative. These kinds of things have been tried before, like the male golfer who tried to play LPGA tour events.
 
My brother was a Houston police officer for 25 years. He said that black officers were more than welcome to join either of the police unions, but that white officers were excluded from the black union. Oh, well.
 
When I was in Cegep (junior college) all african american students where AUTOMATICALLY inrolled in the "black and third world" club. But when a student, a black guy BTW, upset that he was enrolled in this club, tried to start "white and first world" club it was denied.

(the part about being enrolled in clubs there was the more members, the bigger budget you get)
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
Man, this is crazy. A white lawmaker banned from the Black Caucus based on race, then accused by those banning him of being...you guessed it...a racist.

"I'm not but you are!"

No comment from me as to political party affiliation of those involved, it's as you'd expect.

So...who's wrong here? And why?
Click to expand...

Actually? They're both wrong. Shaw, for being a pinhead, and not giving over a copy of the bylaws like he agreed to, and Campfield, for trying to bolster his appeal by stirring shit. Now...if Shaw had acted honorably, and handed over the copy of the bylaws, like he agreed to, this would be a non-issue. Instead, he, too, is trying to bolster his appeal by stirring shit. In other words...politics as usual.
 
Winky said:
Why? were all the Looters and people in the superdome Black???????
Click to expand...

According to most press outlets, all the looters were black. The white folks were 'foraging'. You may now place your head back up yer butt. :p
 
Yep that's the ticket.

You loot, we shoot!

Funny how fast that martial law got repealed down thar.
Betcha it wouldn't have if thar'd bean White folks involved heh heh

So Grotto you be stickin' up foe dah
brothas that were shootin' at the rescue choppers ain't cha?
 
Gato_Solo said:
Actually? They're both wrong. Shaw, for being a pinhead, and not giving over a copy of the bylaws like he agrred to, and Campfield, for trying to bolster his appeal by stirring shit.
Click to expand...

What makes you think Campfiled was, or wanted to, stir shit?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top