Sarah Palin Readies Bus Tour Amid 2012 Speculation
- Thread starter Cerise
- Start date
2minkey
bootlicker
oh noes but they'll make us cut a bunch of programs! what will happen to the fake-resident californians from suburbia, USA that become stoner-surfers, get food allowances, and go to community college for free? will that shit get cut? how will they pay for weed?
spike
New Member
As you can see by the chart, if you cut taxes and do not also reduce spending your deficit will balloon.
It's like if you said "taking a giant pay cut will cost me nothing" but you put it in big letters for some reason.
catocom
Well-Known Member
I think it's hilarious the none in the media, and so called analysts can
'figure out' what Palin is doing.
It quite obvious to me, because I do it all the time.
I have much more respect just in the last few weeks for Sarah than I've have thus far.
Keep um guessin' lady.
'figure out' what Palin is doing.
It quite obvious to me, because I do it all the time.
I have much more respect just in the last few weeks for Sarah than I've have thus far.
Keep um guessin' lady.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
God you're an idiot (statement of fact).
So you are under the impression that entitlements do not create debt? It all creates debt and the debt is paid by the the people. Corporations pass along taxes to the consumer, people pay the taxes for everything in the end.
Spending causes debt, quit spending what you don't have. Cut what you must to get your spending under control and pay off your debt.
Really, MediaMatters needs you back, or you could run for California Assembly.
So you are under the impression that entitlements do not create debt? It all creates debt and the debt is paid by the the people. Corporations pass along taxes to the consumer, people pay the taxes for everything in the end.
Spending causes debt, quit spending what you don't have. Cut what you must to get your spending under control and pay off your debt.
Really, MediaMatters needs you back, or you could run for California Assembly.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
Keep um guessin' lady.
spike
New Member
Says the guy who couldn't read the chart.
Where did I say that?
Some corporations pay taxes. If you think they just pass them along to the consumer then you could say that the consumer passes them back to corporations by requiring increased salaries.
Along with the other things in the graph obviously.
This is pathetic trolling. Really, you're not a very skilled troll. It's like trying to have an adult conversation with a 3 year old all like "wwwaaaaaaah whaaaaaaah whhhhaaaaaaaaah".
I'll try explaining this to you again:
See the line where it says "Debt without these factors"? Look at the stuff above it. That stuff changes the line where the debt amount is.
ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
Right, it's an incomplete chart, incomplete like your brain.
HERP DERP CHART
HERP DERP CHART
spike
New Member
Winky
Well-Known Member
How's that hope and change werkin' out for you
You see along the way I've determined there are two types of Liberals
the first is like Minx which realize that spending more than
you take in increases debt, (which requires a PhD).
But will not admit to this knowledge?
and then there are those like Spike
who are so disconnected from reality that they are hopeless
heck he even brought into hope and change!
You see along the way I've determined there are two types of Liberals
the first is like Minx which realize that spending more than
you take in increases debt, (which requires a PhD).
But will not admit to this knowledge?
and then there are those like Spike
who are so disconnected from reality that they are hopeless
heck he even brought into hope and change!
spike
New Member
How so? It shows pretty clearly what effects different things had on the debt. I think maybe you still don't understand it.
Concentrate on the "Debt without these factors" line....then look above it.
Cerise
Well-Known Member
Say, nice one. Now, see if you can continue....
Who was in charge of Congress when the spending kept going up?
*sigh*
Not getting a raise costs you nothing. Having your pay cut is a reduction in salary. However, since the government is not getting a paycheck but
is taking money from one group of citizens & giving it to another, it's not comparable.
spike
New Member
Re: How's that hope and change werkin' out for you
Winky you have some extreme slowness on the way you determine things. I've already tried explaining the same thing to Gonz.
See when you cut taxes (what you take in) without also decreasing spending you balloon the debt which is why the Bush tax cuts were such a disaster. Maybe you mixed me up with Gonz?
Also, who is that girl and how old is she. Seems a little disturbing.
Winky you have some extreme slowness on the way you determine things. I've already tried explaining the same thing to Gonz.
See when you cut taxes (what you take in) without also decreasing spending you balloon the debt which is why the Bush tax cuts were such a disaster. Maybe you mixed me up with Gonz?
Also, who is that girl and how old is she. Seems a little disturbing.
spike
New Member
Well the tax cuts were in 2001 and 2003. There were a bunch of people in Congress. I'm sure you can look up who.
I think what you're going for here maybe is that you can never blame the president for spending even if he signs the bills. Does that mean you won't ever be blaming Obama for any spending?
It is comparable. If you're running your house on a certain budget and you cut the amount of money coming in without trimming your budget you have a good chance of going in debt. It's simple addition and subtraction Gonz. Winky has the idea.