catocom Well-Known Member Mar 18, 2010 #41 So why was he against it to start with then, with that logic? Just playing for more, he thought, maybe?
So why was he against it to start with then, with that logic? Just playing for more, he thought, maybe?
spike New Member Mar 19, 2010 #42 He was fighting for a public option among other things. They might have to do that separately or go with Grayson's bill.
He was fighting for a public option among other things. They might have to do that separately or go with Grayson's bill.
V valkyrie Well-Known Member Mar 19, 2010 #43 He was not against it from the start, only after the public option was taken out. I'm upset about it too. I think the public option needs to be available. I think this, along with other steps, will help to make insurance affordable.
He was not against it from the start, only after the public option was taken out. I'm upset about it too. I think the public option needs to be available. I think this, along with other steps, will help to make insurance affordable.
catocom Well-Known Member Mar 19, 2010 #44 yeah, Dennis clarified, and it was as thought. I'm satisfied with his answer, 'cause I know how he is anyway. I don't agree with him, but he's got more honestly, and integrity than most the other buttholes on the left up there.
yeah, Dennis clarified, and it was as thought. I'm satisfied with his answer, 'cause I know how he is anyway. I don't agree with him, but he's got more honestly, and integrity than most the other buttholes on the left up there.
spike New Member Mar 19, 2010 #45 Kinda how I feel about Ron Paul. I don't agree with him on many things but he's got more honesty and integrity than most of the other idiots on the right.
Kinda how I feel about Ron Paul. I don't agree with him on many things but he's got more honesty and integrity than most of the other idiots on the right.
