Taxes at Lowest Levels in 60 Years

catocom said:
They got the go ahead from the treasury, because they had the say on the regulation.
the banks repaid the "Government"
The government did not then return it to the treasury.
The Government still has it.
The Treasury does Not have it.
Click to expand...

I'm going to need you to go ahead and show some proof that the Treasury does not have it.

"Treasury doesn't expect to ask Congress for more bailout money, partly because the department can re-use the $68 billion if needed to support other lenders later"

That would indicate that the Treasury does have it.

on Holland...forget it man
I just don't find his little poll credible.
Click to expand...

Is that because it doesn't line up with what you want to believe?

Is that why you made up this stuff about him being a joke and a possible felon that you supposedly read about but can't provide any support for?
 
You keep talking about 68 billion.
While that is a lot of money, What about the other 600 billion?
Most of which they say wasn't even used, yet wasn't returned.
Where is it?

and
yep, it doesn't line up with what I believe, because of other polls by
people I Do trust.
no I won't be citing those polls...say what you will.
 
catocom said:
You keep talking about 68 billion.
Click to expand...

Yes, that was one example.

While that is a lot of money, What about the other 600 billion?
Most of which they say wasn't even used, yet wasn't returned.
Where is it?
Click to expand...

I'd say if it wasn't used it's still at the treasury.

yep, it doesn't line up with what I believe, because of other polls by
people I Do trust.
no I won't be citing those polls...say what you will.
Click to expand...

That's laughable Cat. You ask for link after link from me, then confine it to "the big three", then you don't even read them so you can stay in denial.

Yet you claim something (I'm not sure what) based on some polls which you refuse to cite.

You claim you've read up on some guy and he is a joke and possibly a felon and give absolutely nothing to support those ideas.

I'm sure you can see the problem here. You are determined to believe something regardless of all facts to the contrary and no facts supporting what you want to believe. So much so that it is likely that you've completely invented some non-existent polls and some felony insinuations.
 
I haven't invented anything, but other than that, I guess
we're about a 'clear' as the understanding is going to get here.

my objective here has been met.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top