Spirit said:I'm still waiting for that damn Giants pic.
Professur said:What really bothers me about breast reduction (outside of the horror of loosing any breast) is the antiseptic way they treat it. In order to reduce visible scar tissue, they cut underneath, and tuck. And then, if the nipple's out of place, they cut it off, and sew it back on wherever they feel looks best.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3807540&dopt=AbstractAll non-operated breasts have an irregular pattern of sensibility. The areola is distinctly more sensitive than its periphery; the nipple has a very low grade of sensitivity. The postoperative sensitivity increases for about 2 years without reaching the former level. The loss of sensitivity is unrelated to the method of operation (Stromberg, Pitanguy). The loss of sensitivity is proportional to the reduction of tissue. Most important is to keep the ability for breast-feeding (sympathetic innervation by the arterior branch of the 4th ramus cutaneous lateralis).
tonksy said:Prof? I've had the shoulder grooves for ages...but I ain't in Canada.
tonksy said:Prof? I've had the shoulder grooves for ages...but I ain't in Canada.
BTW - I retook the giants photo...but now I am being shy.