I feel the same way. A movie from a novel is necessarily an interpretive work, you may or may not agree with the interpretation.HeXp£Øi± said:Well, they're never exactly the same. It's usually just the basic storyline that's followed from the book. I think it's amazing just how much material actually was translated onto the screen. imo some people are just too overcritical of Peter Jackson. This entire production is just so huge and amazing, i just can't imagine that anyone else could have done a better job.
Ms Ann Thrope said:When I found out what Jackson did to Faramir's role, I took a pass on TTT. I may take a look at the extended edition to see how badly he did mangle it
Mirlyn said:Never seen any of the movies, or read the books. I've heard equal sides to whether I'm missing anything or not.
greenfreak said:You should. Although I still think they could have done a better job with showing Faramir as the more sensitive man he was in the book, the extended edition goes into much greater detail on what drove him to keep Frodo and Sam in his grasp. It played up the relationship with Boromir and their father too. I understand why they took it out though, it felt strained, like a typical cheesy ploy for a father's pride.
AlladinSane said:Sixteen days and counting...