ok, so, we give the Pakis a billion or more a year, for what?
To fund both sides of the war, apparently.
It's seem pretty apparent to me, personally, since back before Musharraf was even ousted,
during Bushes reign.
The incident, recounted by former U.S. officials, underscores the schizophrenic relationship with one of America's most crucial counterterrorism allies. Publicly, officials credit Pakistani collaboration with helping kill and capture numerous Al Qaeda and Taliban leaders. Privately, that relationship is often marked by mistrust as the two countries wage an aggressive spy battle against each other.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ocked-aggressive-spy-battles/?test=latestnews
No nation can afford to fund both sides of a war, and survive economically.
Doesn't that seem like common since?
If so, why did Bush do it, and why is Obama continuing it?
It's either insanity, or there's an objective that both of them know, that we don't.
I certainly can't even start to guess what possible good could come from it now.
The Pakis have already proven that they aren't going to do what needs to be done,
and get bin laden.
It's been near 10 years! Good grief!