Jerrek said:You thought wrong.flavio said:I thought you only worked part of the year and didn't even pay taxes?
And my parents pay taxes. Both of them. 45% That is such an encouragement knowing that the harder I'm going to work the more money the government is going to steal.
Because I work only part of the year, I don't currently pay any federal taxes. I am forced to pay for Canadian Pension Plan and for Unemployment Insurance though. Grr.
Um dude, if you make $36,000 you would pay 17% on $1,000. If you made $70,000, you would pay 17% on $35,000....outside looking in said:Jerrek said:Forbes suggested that those under $36,000 pay NO TAX at all. I can go with that. Those over that amount pay 17%. No matter how much you make, you pay 17%. The more you make, the more tax dollars you pay, but it doesn't go up exponentially. It will encourage people more than the current system to work harder and earn more.
OK, I'm all in favor of a flat tax, but the above suggestion is ludicrous.
If you make $35,000 a year you keep $35,000 a year.
If you make $36,000 a year you keep $29,880 a year.
In fact, you'd have to make $43,375 to keep the same amount as someone making $35,000.
No, you have three choices:
(1) A flat tax across the board
(2) A linear tax across the board
(3) A linear tax up to some point, and it's flat from thereon.
I'd vote for number (1) first, and number (3) next, with (3) being the closest to what we have in the US currently.
Whoever said we should have a flat tax and fix the loopholes had it right.
Ever heard of co-op? It is a way of working full time part of the year. I work full time. Part of the year. Not too hard to comprehend, eh?flavio said:Jerrek said:You thought wrong.flavio said:I thought you only worked part of the year and didn't even pay taxes?
And my parents pay taxes. Both of them. 45% That is such an encouragement knowing that the harder I'm going to work the more money the government is going to steal.
I thought wrong?
Really?
Maybe it's because in your first post you said:
Because I work only part of the year, I don't currently pay any federal taxes. I am forced to pay for Canadian Pension Plan and for Unemployment Insurance though. Grr.
So which is it?
Then your original statement was just poorly worded.Jerrek said:Um dude, if you make $36,000 you would pay 17% on $1,000. If you made $70,000, you would pay 17% on $35,000....
OK, that part is clear enough. Under $36,000, zero tax.Jerrek said:Forbes suggested that those under $36,000 pay NO TAX at all.
I guess I missed the part where you said 17% on the portion in excess of $35,000. You said pay 17%, not stipulations, no qualifiers, just pay 17% if you make $36,000 or better.Those over that amount pay 17%. No matter how much you make, you pay 17%.
Well sorry about that. English is my third language and sometimes I don't make myself clear, but I am working on that. Thanks.Then your original statement was just poorly worded.
Ever heard of co-op? It is a way of working full time part of the year. I work full time. Part of the year. Not too hard to comprehend, eh?
Squiggy said:Mind if I watch, flav? You're good at this...
Are you daft? I said up there I pay EI and CPP...flavio said:Ever heard of co-op? It is a way of working full time part of the year. I work full time. Part of the year. Not too hard to comprehend, eh?
What's hard to comprehend is what you meant by "You thought wrong".
So what did you mean?
So when I said "I thought you only work part of the year and don't pay taxes" it sounds like that was true.
And by saying "You thought wrong" you actually meant "You are correct sir".
Um you really don't make sense. You said "don't pay taxes", and I said you thought wrong, because I do pay EI and CPP.flavio said:So when I said "I thought you only work part of the year and don't pay taxes" it sounds like that was true.
And by saying "You thought wrong" you actually meant "You are correct sir".
So I assume that above is cleared up now too?
Are your words intentionally misleading or is it something you just can't help?
Merriam Webster's definition of "tax":Professur said:Those aren't taxes, Jer. They're contributions