Think Government Is Corrupt? You May Face 10 Years In Jail

Gotholic

Well-Known Member
Think Government Is Corrupt? You May Face 10 Years In Jail

South Carolina forces “subversives” to register with the authorities or do hard time

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, February 8, 2010

Subversives who think government is corrupt and should be controlled by the people face 10 years in prison and a $25,000 dollar fine if they fail to register with authorities in South Carolina, in another chilling example of how free speech and dissent is being criminalized in America.

The state’s “Subversive Activities Registration Act” is now officially on the books and mandates that “Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States … shall register with the Secretary of State.”

Of course, the right to overthrow a government that has become corrupt, abusive and completely unrepresentative of its electorate is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence – that’s how America came to be a Republic in the first place – advocating or teaching that the people should “control” the government via their elected representatives is a basic function of a democratic society, but this law effectively makes it a terrorist offense.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness,” states the Declaration of Independence.

Under the sweeping terms of the law, members of tax protest organizations, the Tea Party movement and the States’ Rights movement based in South Carolina are all domestic terrorists if they fail to register their dissent with the authorities.

It is important to stress that the notion this law somehow only applies to “Islamic terrorists” is completely at odds with the fact that federal and state authorities now consider the main terror threat to be from informed American citizens exercising their constitutional rights in opposition to the big government agenda they are being subjected to.

As we saw with the MIAC report and a plethora of similar training manuals which were leaked over the last decade, police are being trained that libertarians, gun owners, Ron Paul supporters and anyone who is mildly political is a domestic extremist and a potential terrorist – these people are the real target of the subversives list in South Carolina.

The infamous Phoenix Federal Bureau of Investigation manual (page one, page two) produced in association with the Joint Terrorism Task Force listed “defenders of the U.S. constitution” and “lone individuals” as terrorists. Will anyone in South Carolina who defends the Constitution, the very bedrock of what America stands for, have to register with the authorities unless they want to be locked up for a decade?

Of course, since nobody is going to register as a “subversive” with South Carolina authorities, their failure to “comply” with the regulation will later be used against them as a means of eliciting criminal charges, in what represents a clear end run around the First Amendment.

The government isn’t going to just come out all guns blazing and ban free speech, they are simply going to make anyone who refuses to register for permission a criminal for failing to adhere to a separate mandate.

Just like people in places such as New York and Chicago were told that they had to get a license to purchase a gun – at first the process was a mere inconvenience but now the licensing process means they have to jump through 200 flaming hoops and the second amendment has effectively been outlawed in these cities.

They won’t hesitate to pull the same tricks with the First Amendment, and it’s already happening with calls to license Internet users and force them to get government permission to run a website.

Source
 
The article likes the skip the important parts.

1) Controlled or funded by foreign governments
2) by force or violence

So...
an American owned/funded group promoting overthrowing the GVT - okay
An Iraqi owned/funded group promoting overthrowing the GVT - Not so okay*
* unless they don't promote the use of violence
* unless they register

So...what's the issue again?
 
more prison planet garbage. of course they skip important distinctions. that would negatively impact their sensationalism.
 
The article likes the skip the important parts.

1) Controlled or funded by foreign governments
2) by force or violence

So...
an American owned/funded group promoting overthrowing the GVT - okay
An Iraqi owned/funded group promoting overthrowing the GVT - Not so okay*
* unless they don't promote the use of violence
* unless they register

So...what's the issue again?

I read the links within the article. When it says "force" it really could mean anything.
 
I read the links within the article. When it says "force" it really could mean anything.

these_are_not_the_droids.jpg


Sure it can "These are not the conspiracy theories that you're looking for."
 
these_are_not_the_droids.jpg


Sure it can "These are not the conspiracy theories that you're looking for."

It said by force or violence. Violence is a form of force. But it said force distinctly separate as in general. As I linked you to the definition of "force" this falls under it:

any body of persons combined for joint action

Read in-between the lines, you must, Padawan.
 
BTW, just FTR, of course the government is corrupt. I've been saying that for decades and interestingly, no one from the government has ever suggested I stop (or that I'm wrong for that matter).
 
Back
Top