Two straight Canadians to marry

Professur

Well-Known Member
By Lester Haines
Published Monday 8th August 2005 15:35 GMT
Get breaking Reg news straight to your desktop - click here to find out how
We're sure that most Reg readers don't object to gay marriage as long as it doesn't frighten the horses, but we wonder if that liberal sentiment extends to heterosexual same-sex union?

We'll find out soon enough, because Canadians Bill Dalrymple, 56, and chum Bryan Pinn, 65 have decided to tie the knot, the Ottawa Sun reports.

Although Pinn is reported as calling the impending nuptials a "hoot", there is good business sense behind the proposal. Pinn adds: "There are significant tax implications that we don't think the government has thought through."

Indeed, the pair want to "shed light on the widespread financial implications of the new [gay marriage] legislation and are willing to take it all the way".

Well, not quite all the way, because there will be no consumation of this particular union. The two have, though, checked that there are "no laws in marriage that define sexual preference".

Dalrymple and Pinn conclude by saying their upcoming wedding is not intended as a slight to gays and lesbians. However, gay and lesbian rights activist, Bruce Walker, warned: "Generally speaking, marriage should be for love. People who don't marry for love will find themselves in trouble," although he gamely conceded: "If someone wants to do something foolish, let them do it." ®

Source
 
The two have, though, checked that there are "no laws in marriage that define sexual preference".
Psst... look up the word "consummating" in relation to marriage and the phrase "Lack of consent to the marriage can manifest itself in a marriage ceremony held in jest"
 
If anyone doubted that the sorry shape we find our world in has resulted in marriage being somewhat less than our Creator intended it to be, here's proof.
 
I don't know what yer bitchin' about. Men and women have long practiced the farcical activity of getting married for less than intimate reasons. :shrug:
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
If anyone doubted that the sorry shape we find our world in has resulted in marriage being somewhat less than our Creator intended it to be, here's proof.



I dont see marriage being the result of how fucked the world is. They are separate entities. Marriage hasnt been taken as seriously in the past and less so now.
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
If anyone doubted that the sorry shape we find our world in has resulted in marriage being somewhat less than our Creator intended it to be, here's proof.

Which creator would that be? My parents never really much mentioned what they intended marriage to be?
 
I met her in a club down in old soho
Where you drink champagne and it tastes just like cherry-cola
C-o-l-a cola
She walked up to me and she asked me to dance
I asked her her name and in a dark brown voice she said lola
L-o-l-a lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola

Well I’m not the world’s most physical guy
But when she squeezed me tight she nearly broke my spine
Oh my lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola
Well I’m not dumb but I can’t understand
Why she walked like a woman and talked like a man
Oh my lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola

Well we drank champagne and danced all night
Under electric candlelight
She picked me up and sat me on her knee
And said dear boy won’t you come home with me
Well I’m not the world’s most passionate guy
But when I looked in her eyes well I almost fell for my lola
Lo-lo-lo-lo lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola
Lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola

I pushed her away
I walked to the door
I fell to the floor
I got down on my knees
Then I looked at her and she at me

Well that’s the way that I want it to stay
And I always want it to be that way for my lola
Lo-lo-lo-lo lola
Girls will be boys and boys will be girls
It’s a mixed up muddled up shook up world except for lola
Lo-lo-lo-lo lola

Well I left home just a week before
And I’d never ever kissed a woman before
But lola smiled and took me by the hand
And said dear boy I’m gonna make you a man

Well I’m not the world’s most masculine man
But I know what I am and I’m glad I’m a man
And so is lola
Lo-lo-lo-lo lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola
Lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola lo-lo-lo-lo lola
 
BeardofPants said:
I don't know what yer bitchin' about. Men and women have long practiced the farcical activity of getting married for less than intimate reasons. :shrug:

So the few have defined the practice for the many? Nice, BoP. Kinda like what's being endorsed by the gay community today, eh? ;)
 
A thought occurred to me tonight... what if Arkansas were to legalize gay marriage? Would we have gay cousins marrying?
 
Back
Top