chcr Too cute for words Feb 10, 2006 #21 Gato_Solo said: Ahhh...kinda like the strong-armed tactics used by the 'second-hand smoke' lobby, eh? Click to expand... Nah, they're much more successful with their obfuscation than this.
Gato_Solo said: Ahhh...kinda like the strong-armed tactics used by the 'second-hand smoke' lobby, eh? Click to expand... Nah, they're much more successful with their obfuscation than this.
Gato_Solo Out-freaking-standing OTC member Feb 10, 2006 #22 chcr said: Nah, they're much more successful with their obfuscation than this. Click to expand... Not if you look at the results...
chcr said: Nah, they're much more successful with their obfuscation than this. Click to expand... Not if you look at the results...
chcr Too cute for words Feb 10, 2006 #23 Gato_Solo said: Not if you look at the results... Click to expand... I meant that the second-hand smoke people were more successful. Far and away the most successful propaganda campaign in history.
Gato_Solo said: Not if you look at the results... Click to expand... I meant that the second-hand smoke people were more successful. Far and away the most successful propaganda campaign in history.
flavio Banned Feb 10, 2006 #25 Gato_Solo said: Ahhh...kinda like the strong-armed tactics used by the 'second-hand smoke' lobby, eh? Click to expand... Don't know. How would that be relevant?
Gato_Solo said: Ahhh...kinda like the strong-armed tactics used by the 'second-hand smoke' lobby, eh? Click to expand... Don't know. How would that be relevant?
Gato_Solo Out-freaking-standing OTC member Feb 11, 2006 #26 flavio said: Don't know. How would that be relevant? Click to expand... Same way all that you posted is...when junk science is in your favor, you defend it with every reath. When it isn't you publically decry it's usage.
flavio said: Don't know. How would that be relevant? Click to expand... Same way all that you posted is...when junk science is in your favor, you defend it with every reath. When it isn't you publically decry it's usage.
flavio Banned Feb 11, 2006 #27 Gato_Solo said: you defend it with every reath. When it isn't you publically decry it's usage. Click to expand... I don't suppose your going to back up that statement at all either....probably won't even point out the junk science will you?
Gato_Solo said: you defend it with every reath. When it isn't you publically decry it's usage. Click to expand... I don't suppose your going to back up that statement at all either....probably won't even point out the junk science will you?
catocom Well-Known Member Mar 10, 2006 #28 flavio said: With the track record his appointees have it would have to be an improvement to get some less corrupt somewhat qualified people in instead. Click to expand... Well, I'm not too big of a man that I can't admit when I'm wrong. At this point, I'll have to. I seem to be getting proven more and more wrong on my assessment on this subject. Flav, you are right, he's picked some real shitheads.
flavio said: With the track record his appointees have it would have to be an improvement to get some less corrupt somewhat qualified people in instead. Click to expand... Well, I'm not too big of a man that I can't admit when I'm wrong. At this point, I'll have to. I seem to be getting proven more and more wrong on my assessment on this subject. Flav, you are right, he's picked some real shitheads.
catocom Well-Known Member Mar 10, 2006 #29 I wonder if we are about to see a BIG shake-up??? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,187479,00.html
