LOL 2minkey I was thinking as you as one of those two. Perhaps I am too pessimistic about the people here, it may be more like four or five.
But BTW thanks for pointing out what an arrogant prick I am, and I say that in all seriousness. I need to be reminded of my shortcomings now and again so I can try to keep them in check.
The point is is the movie has a lot of information in it, stuff that sounds very rational and logical and has the feel of truth. Unfortunately though most people have their idea of reality carved on stone tablets and it can be very upsetting for them to have to get new stone and re carve the tablets. So they just hear about some revolutionary book or movie from say....Fox "News" (or any of a million spin factories), then they debunk it without even watching the damn thing.
I'd wager that many of the cons in here never saw Fahrenheit 911, simply because it was a Michael Moore film, and same for Sicko, and An inconvenient Truth. All the same all three movies had a lot of truth in them. Were they propaganda? Yes, to a point, they were, but to discount them out of hand is wrong because there was a lot of meat on dem bones! Fact is though I am more on Moore's side of these issues, as soon as Fahrenhype 911 came out I saw it too, because I do like to be informed.
My point is that there is a lot to "the movie in question", but be forewarned, that if you are not one who can "take what you need and leave the rest", or are not prepared to have all your training and programmed beliefs challenged it's not for you. Even I had to turn it off during part three because some of the truth's revealed withing were so scary and depressing, and at the same time nothing I can do anything about, that I decided to get back to it later.