I'm sure that's what you did when Clinton was pres.
The difference was, Clinton actually committed a crime. GW is following what Congress voted for.
I'm sure that's what you did when Clinton was pres.
ac·quit (ə-kwĭt') : Law. To free or clear from a charge or accusation.
Gonz said:The difference was, Clinton actually committed a crime. GW is following what Congress voted for.
Clinton was acquitted.
We'll have to see if the same will be true for Bush.
Clinton was acquitted.
He committed perjury.
He was impeached.
Bush has done nothing illegal.
Clinton was acquitted.
We'll have to see if the same will be true for Bush.
I'll play. On what legal charges do you believe that President Bush should be impeached?
Keep in mind Article II section 4 of the Constitution deals specifically with the grounds for impeachment:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
So try to keep your words within the confines of the Constitutionally-driven legislative process. ......
I personally think trying to diminish our sovereignty is treasonous.
Acquitted. Look at the definition again.
It doesn't change the fact.
Why did he lose his law license if he was aquitted?
though i'm not sure how impeachment proceedings are a "constitutionally driven legislative process." i mean, gee, nothing's being legislated during impeachment hearings.