Why Would United States Senators Vote to Protect Corporations Over Rape Victims?

It took an act of Congress!
OK a former washed (never was funny) up
comedian Senator (who stole the election)
to pass a bill, to say she shoulda been raped
again and again.
 
paul_valaru said:
just that I am against rape.

but hey, it's a free country, you can be pro what ever you want.
Click to expand...

Iraq is nutty place, I would move my family there. Nor would I support my wife going there..... you know why?

Its fucking dangerous and she might raped or killed. Do not go to dangerous places like its Disneyland, it aint.
 
ResearchMonkey said:
Iraq is nutty place, I would move my family there. Nor would I support my wife going there..... you know why?

Its fucking dangerous and she might raped or killed. Do not go to dangerous places like its Disneyland, it aint.
Click to expand...

Again, the "she was asking for it" argument.
 
She was asking for it...

Just because her titties were hanging out & her too-short mini-skirt left her labia visible didn't mean it was alright to rape her but it sure as shit didn't help the situation.
 
Gonz said:
This isn't about rape. It's about the jurisdiction to try a crime vs an idiot trying to make it a law to not follow contracts.
Click to expand...

It's about the US doing business with companies that allow that kind of wording in there contracts.

You are right, it's not about rape, it's about worker safety.

I became about rape when people started blaming the victim
 
ResearchMonkey said:
Iraq is nutty place, I would move my family there. Nor would I support my wife going there..... you know why?

Its fucking dangerous and she might raped or killed. Do not go to dangerous places like its Disneyland, it aint.
Click to expand...

I think she was there to work. Not for a Disneyland visit.
 
ResearchMonkey said:
If you contract to go to Iraq for big money and get your head chopped off on YouTube --- yes, you were gambling for big money.
Click to expand...

You're saying if someone goes over to Iraq they should be able to rape or kill any contractor they want without fear of prosecution?
 
Gonz said:
This isn't about rape. It's about the jurisdiction to try a crime vs an idiot trying to make it a law to not follow contracts.
Click to expand...

No, it's about allowing prosecution for crimes no matter what jurisdiction they're in.
 
ResearchMonkey said:
If you contract to go to Iraq for big money and get your head chopped off on YouTube --- yes, you were gambling for big money.

I'm not saying its right, I'm saying that's the reality of it
Click to expand...

So he deserved it too.

I am guessing you think Jews should have moved out of eastern Europe way back when as well.
 
spike said:
You're saying if someone goes over to Iraq they should be able to rape or kill any contractor they want without fear of prosecution?
Click to expand...
I'm saying if you choose to go there, you had better consider that its a very dangerous place and you better not expect it to nice and sweet.

Matbe should have not thought "oh what sweet place". -- she was fool if she thought a war zone is a safe place.
 
ResearchMonkey said:
I'm saying if you choose to go there, you had better consider that its a very dangerous place and you better not expect it to nice and sweet.

Matbe should have not thought "oh what sweet place". -- she was fool if she thought a war zone is a safe place.
Click to expand...

THere's no reason to think she thought it was a safe place. Doesn't really change the fact that she has the right not to be raped by fellow employees and that they should be prosecuted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top