Wikileaks leaker angry over treatment of gays by military

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
Seems that sexuality and selfishness trumps honor and basic humanity, from the homosexual traitor.

Wikileaks leaker angry over treatment of gays by military

"The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole." - Accuracy in Media

The suspect in the leaking of classified military files, Spc. Bradley Manning, voiced his disgust with US Army commanders and U.S. "society at large" on his Facebook page just prior to his alleged downloading of thousands of secret documents, according to the British news media.

According to one story appearing in Britain's The Telegraph, Manning, who served as a US Army intelligence analyst, became depressed after a break-up with his homosexual companion. He also wrote: "Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment," and quoted a joke about "military intelligence" being an oxymoron.


The 22-year old Manning is awaiting court martial as the primary suspect in the leaking of more than 90,000 secret documents to Wikileak.org creator Julian Assang, who in turn posted the documents on his web site. The secret documents subsequently appeared in major U.S. newspapers in a security breach which Pentagon officials say has endangered the lives of serving soldiers and Afghan civilians.


Pentagon investigators plan to delve into Manning’s background to ascertain if they missed any warnings when he applied to join the US Army. According to The Telegraph, in May 2010, when he was serving at a US military base near Baghdad, he changed his status to: "Bradley Manning is now left with the sinking feeling that he doesn't have anything left."


Five days later, according to the Telegraph story, he said he was "livid" after being "lectured by ex-boyfriend", then later the same day said he was "not a piece of equipment" and was "beyond frustrated with people and society at large".


Manning was arrested at the end of May after allegedly leaking a controversial video of a U.S. helicopter attack, and he became the chief suspect when the Afghan war documents were leaked to Wikileak.org and appeared in the Washington Post and New York Times.



Manning, who is reportedly on suicide watch, was transferred from a military jail in Kuwait to a prison in Washington DC, as the Pentagon called in the FBI to assist in the hunt for the source of the leak.


According to Accuracy in Media, a media watchdog group, Manning's Facebook page shows that he enjoyed the MSNBC program hosted by Rachel Maddow, the lesbian activist, and that he listed the left-wing Media Matters and the National Center for Transgender Equality as being among his “likes and interests.”


"Manning’s affinity on his Facebook page for 'Repeal the Ban' is also significant. It is a project of a group called Servicemembers United, which describes itself as the nation’s largest organization of gay and lesbian troops and veterans, their allies and supporters. The group receives financial support from the Open Society Institute of billionaire George Soros," wrote AIM's editor Cliff Kincaid.

Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast."

resizedbradleymanningch.jpg


More at the Examiner


Manning's butt-hurt is already getting people killed, and its just beginning.
Taliban Seeks Vengeance in Wake of WikiLeaks

Leaked U.S. Intel documents listed the names and villages of Afghan collaborators—and the Taliban is starting to retaliate.

<s>

And over the weekend one tribal elder, Khalifa Abdullah, who the Taliban believed had been in close contact with the Americans, was taken from his home in Monar village, in Kandahar province’s embattled Arghandab district, and executed by insurgent gunmen.

The violence may just be beginning.

Newsweak

Do ask, do tell. :banghead:

execute.
 
wow you just jizzed in your pants didn't you?

hey, osama bin laden is straight. so were hitler, stalin, pol pot, robert mugabe, and so on... my god, it's that heterosexual mass murder agenda!

seriously, this thread is disappointing... but not surprising.
 
yes, it's a gay thing. the tone of your post really says it all. if you're going to be a bigot, at least be amusing.
 
well, better stand guard. those lascivious homos might come around at any time, and impregnate your live stock.
 
Granted, leaking secret docs is pretty gay..but what his sexuality has anything to do with the issue at hand is another story.

In the United States, the Washington Post last week dealt a possibly crippling blow to the entire U.S. secret establishment. Two reporters, working for a year, discovered that the covert side of American government is not only much larger than anyone guessed but also remarkably less secretive. They learned that about 854,000 people hold top-secret clearance.

One tenth that number would have seemed high. Moreover, these people work for 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies. This is an out-of-control, frequently redundant bureaucracy: No fewer than 51 federal organizations, for instance, track the flow of money that finances terrorists.


And they still can’t get their computers in sync. Michael Leiter, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, has four monitors on his desk. Unifying information systems is apparently too difficult, and some agencies don’t want it. Leiter reports modest progress: He now gets all his e-mail on one computer. “That’s a big deal,” he says.

Finally, the WikiLeak of 91,000 secret documents related to the war in Afghanistan has demonstrated, more clearly than any other event, the costly silliness of stealth-crazed government. Except for potentially harmful details, little in the classified documents was new. Robert Gibbs, the presidential press secretary, reached a new level of awkwardness when making this point: “I don’t know that what is being said, or what is being reported, isn’t something that hasn’t been discussed fairly publicly.” A triple negative, exceptional even by press-briefing standards, yet true.



Read more: http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/07/31/robert-fulford-the-end-of-secrecy/#ixzz0va2peBlB
 
Kinda strange how the state run media is laying low on this story. Here's a little more:

First, Private Manning is openly homosexual. Did you know that? I didn't; if the fact has been reported in the American press, I've missed it. Moreover, Manning was an activist who demonstrated against Congress's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. His Facebook includes a photo of him at a gay rights rally, holding a sign demanding equality on "the battlefield." Further, he has posted anti-military comments on his Facebook page. An uncle describes him as "an introverted kid who loved computers and was fired up politically." That tantalizing reference is left hanging. Whether he was fired up about something other than gay rights remains unknown, for the moment.

These are facts that would no doubt be of interest to American readers, yet, as so often happens, our reporters and editors appear to be engaged in a policy of collective discretion. Imagine, though, if Manning had been a tea partier, if he had been photographed holding an anti-government sign at a tea party rally, and if friends described him as being "fired up" about conservative politics. Do you think those facts would be prominently featured in the media narrative about the leaks?


Gawker:

It's been speculated that alleged Army leaker, PFC Bradley Manning, is transgendered. We've found evidence that strongly suggests Manning has some sort of LGBT identity, and that the man who snitched on him exploited this to win his trust.

There are many unanswered questions about this story—the largest of which is: Why would Manning trust an ex-hacker he had never met enough to confess, almost immediately, via instant message, his terrible Wikileaks secret—something he knew could put him in prison for a long time? Lamo told Salon that Manning found him by doing a Twitter search for "Wikileaks," and that he doesn't know what motivated his confession. Yeah fucking right.

Wired suggested Manning sensed a "kindred-spirit in the ex-hacker" Lamo. But Manning and Lamo also apparently share something stronger than a fondness for breaking into computer systems: An LGBT identity. Lamo is an out bisexual, while an increasing number of clues suggest that Manning is, if not transgendered, deeply uncertain about his sexuality and/or gender. Interviews with Lamo's acquaintances and a close reading of the chat logs suggest Lamo traded on this identity to exploit Manning at his most vulnerable, as questions about his sexuality were unbearably pressing on his personal and professional lives.
 
Back
Top