Your 15 yr old daughter?

While agreeing with SnP's original post, I'll answer the original thread question with a resounding NO!
 
SouthernN'Proud said:
A parent should have been there.
Click to expand...

he was.
cuar01_miley0806.jpg


a lot of people don't know/ignore that fact!
 
Inkara1 said:
Miley Cyrus isn't even OK with that photo... she's pretty pissed off, actually, from what I understand.
Click to expand...

she was fine with it, until Disney (who produces her show) was pissed off, then she changed her tune (towed the company line.)

Now if it was my kid I would say no way. On the other hand...


It is not porn, it is artistic (well meant to be, I think the picture looks like shit). I beleive leibowitz was going for beauty, not sexual explotation.
 
tonksy said:
Soooo...If Miley Cyrus was your 15 year old daughter would you be ok with this photo in a magazine?

miley.jpg
Click to expand...

I seen that yesterday, and some parents are pitching a fit, since their young kids look up to her. Supossitly, she didnt want that picture posted or her dad, but if not why did she give the ok to do it????

Looks like childporn to me!!!!
 
Why did she agree to do it? She's 15. All a 15 year old cares about is looking good. D'uh.

Doesn't anyone want to tell her to sit up straight? Or is it just my mom genes?
 
I think I'm missing something...is the goal here for her to look sexy? Because she looks like a zombie to me. Is it just scandalous because she's just got a blanket on?
 
I think it's scandalous because the 15 year old minor looks like a naked, coked-out lolita and the only person that the media and population at large wants to blame is the 15 year old minor.
 
She looks like a strung-out Drew Barrymore.

Or, simply put, like Drew Barrymore...



They's plenty of blame to go around, Tonks. Her, her "parents", her managers, the waste of DNA who arranged it...take your pick. All I'm saying is, she ain't blameless, and to start whining AFTER she posed is too little too late.
 
First off is Vanity Fair even read by Miley/Hannah's fan base ,if not why did her Manager/Parents allow her to do it,without realizing the implications?

As for the pic ,if thats half nekkid,then the beach going young girls are fully naked.Even the showing of mid drift and lower back is more appalling in young girls ,not to mention the word "juicy" on the ass of their pants.She has more of a smirk on her face than a vacant look of a heroine addict.The sensualish pic of her with her Dad is way more Creepy.

What girl of that age wouldn't want a pic that showed herself in a flattering way,the fact it was printed and available for the perverts of the world is damning,not the image contents itself.
 
paul_valaru said:
she was fine with it, until Disney (who produces her show) was pissed off, then she changed her tune (towed the company line.)

Now if it was my kid I would say no way. On the other hand...


It is not porn, it is artistic (well meant to be, I think the picture looks like shit). I beleive leibowitz was going for beauty, not sexual explotation.
Click to expand...

Beauty? Sorry, but with those shadows under her eyes and her ribs showing she looks like a junkie to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top