Iran Still Not Working on "Nookyaler" Weapons

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cerise

Cerise

Well-Known Member
Considering the makeover America has had in the eyes of the world is it safe to assume that simply being liked will hold enough charm to disarm Iminajihad?

Surely our U.S. 0lympic Bargaining Team will finesse the gold. :shrug:

Report Says Iran Has Data to Make a Nuclear Bomb


Senior staff members of the United Nations nuclear agency have concluded in a confidential analysis that Iran has acquired “sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable” atom bomb.

The report by experts in the International Atomic Energy Agency stresses in its introduction that its conclusions are tentative and subject to further confirmation of the evidence, which it says came from intelligence agencies and its own investigations.

But the report’s conclusions, described by senior European officials, go well beyond the public positions taken by several governments, including the United States.

Two years ago, American intelligence agencies published a detailed report concluding that Tehran halted its efforts to design a nuclear weapon in 2003. But in recent months, Britain has joined France, Germany and Israel in disputing that conclusion, saying the work has been resumed.

A senior American official said last week that the United States was now re-evaluating its 2007 conclusions.

The atomic agency’s report also presents evidence that beyond improving upon bomb-making information gathered from rogue nuclear experts around the world, Iran has done extensive research and testing on how to fashion the components of a weapon. It does not say how far that work has progressed.

The report, titled “Possible Military Dimensions of Iran’s Nuclear Program,” was produced in consultation with a range of nuclear weapons experts inside and outside the agency. It draws a picture of a complex program, run by Iran’s Ministry of Defense, “aimed at the development of a nuclear payload to be delivered using the Shahab 3 missile system,” Iran’s medium-range missile, which can strike the Middle East and parts of Europe. The program, according to the report, apparently began in early 2002.

If Iran is designing a warhead, that would represent only part of the complex process of making nuclear arms. Experts say Iran has already mastered the hardest part, enriching the uranium that can be used as nuclear fuel.
Click to expand...
 
ResearchMonkey

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
If Obama is wrong and If Akmedbinjihad has already told the truth....... its going to be Obama's legacy that he watched Israel get blown off the map.

120pxallahgreensvg.png



....and the USA is next.
 
Cerise

Cerise

Well-Known Member
Is 0bambi lying about intelligence for political purposes as they claimed Bush did in an attempt to rule the world????

A-jad to 0bambi: "You Lie!!"

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's president hit back Saturday at President Barack Obama's accusation that his country had sought to hide its construction of a new nuclear site, arguing that Tehran reported the facility to the U.N. even earlier than required.

"The U.S. president made a big and historic mistake," Iranian state TV quoted Ahmadinejad as saying. "Later it became clear that (his) information was wrong and that we had no secrecy."
Click to expand...
 
ResearchMonkey

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
spike said:
Yeah, nobody was talking about the View either. I'm sure you can see the similarities in the remarks.
Click to expand...
But in the past you have always been able to avoid answering question by saying "no ones talking about that"

Clear hypocrisy on your part yet again. Another one of your 4-point of reasonable debate.

Don't you think Obama should have just went to France and spent his many hours with is generals trying to find a solution to saving young soldiers lives instead of being a socialite with Oprah and his wife at the IOC?

twenty-five minutes.
 
spike

spike

New Member
ResearchMonkey said:
But in the past you have always been able to avoid answering question by saying "no ones talking about that"
Click to expand...

Who's avoiding answering a question here?


Don't you think Obama should have just went to France and spent his many hours with is generals trying to find a solution to saving young soldiers lives instead of being a socialite with Oprah and his wife at the IOC?
Click to expand...

Hard to say. Perhaps Bush should have been spending more time with his generals finding solutions instead of spending days being a socialite spectator at the Beijing Olympics for days. We don't really know.
 
ResearchMonkey

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
spike said:
Hard to say. Perhaps Bush should have been spending more time with his generals finding solutions instead of spending days being a socialite spectator at the Beijing Olympics for days. We don't really know.
Click to expand...
You really can't help it can you.
 
MrBishop

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
Cerise

Cerise

Well-Known Member
Did We Elect a Beta Male As President?


While we've all been seeking a political rationale for the president's actions, his behavior goes beyond the political to something deeper and more personal: like all beta males, Barack Obama simply does not have the temperament to confront tyrannical alpha males around the globe.

In this light, even his inability to work with American allies Gordon Brown and Nikolas Sarkozy is a function of his being incapable of facing down the world's tyrants: to cooperate with our allies would require Obama to display alpha male behaviors, including demonstrating courage, something he's simply not capable of doing.

The president's beta-male proclivities are arguably putting the safety of his constituents, the citizens of our country, in serious jeopardy.

Another cue to this unfortunate character trait of the president's can be found in the lack of assertiveness of his oratorical style. While many people insist that Barack Obama is a wonderful speaker, in fact, he exhibits less emotional range when he addresses a crowd than his predecessor, George W. Bush, did.

He may have better speechwriters than W, but his delivery is monotonic and his cadences clipped, both signs of a beta male, unsure of himself, putting his words out there more for the purpose of seeking approval than of providing leadership.

Being a beta male is all about developing strategies for deflecting aggression, and for this reason, beta males do have an important place in society. Within the confines of a social unit, beta-male behavior can help to defuse aggression and maintain domestic peace.

But in a world where other nations' alpha-male leaders are constantly probing for even the smallest signs of weakness, having a beta male president has thrown into stark relief the dangers to which this president's unfortunate character trait is exposing his country.

To return to the canine metaphor: It's the height of folly to think that other nations won't be doing everything they can to make President Obama their bitch.
Click to expand...
 
MrBishop

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
Cerise said:
:shrug:

It's something you can find on the internet.
Click to expand...

Then why is this statment a big deal?
Iran has acquired “sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable” atom bomb.

You and I and anyone with internet access and the ability to read now have sufficient information to be able to design and produce a workable atom bomb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top