NIMBY

Luis G

<i><b>Problemator</b></i>
Staff member
Gonz said:
Sure I have. How many are up & pumping?

More envirowhacko NIMBYs.


We have several, in fact most of our electricity is produced that way.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
At roughly one third our population. I'd also like to lok at efficiency ratings between US power companies & Mexican power companies.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
SouthernN'Proud said:
*checks to make sure*

Yep. They all feature a sun.

Minneapolis, Dec 26
Length of Day: 8h 47m

Insufficient.

On the other hand, I have been flabbergasted at Arizona for not using its main resource.
 

Luis G

<i><b>Problemator</b></i>
Staff member
Gonz said:
At roughly one third our population. I'd also like to lok at efficiency ratings between US power companies & Mexican power companies.

Considering that we sell electricity to California, and that we can produce more electricity than we need, I'd say.....we're more efficient.

edit: we have only 1 power company, ran by goverment (CFE). There's another one but I believe it depends on the production of CFE.
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
Gonz said:
Sure I have. How many are up & pumping?

More envirowhacko NIMBYs.

James Bay 16021 MW
Churchill falls 5,429 MW


Just to name a couple.

And most of that capacity is sold to ........ Yup. NY, Nh, VT, ME.

Niagra? Yup, sells to NY as well.
 

SouthernN'Proud

Southern Discomfort
Gonz said:
Minneapolis, Dec 26


Insufficient.

On the other hand, I have been flabbergasted at Arizona for not using its main resource.

And your degree in engineering is from what university again?

I'll admit it. I have zero idea how it works, how well it works, what the capacities for storing solar energy are, the collection methods...none of it. I know it is a potential source, that it is renewable, clean and ain't likely to run out anytime soon. Beyond that, I must defer to those with the specific knowledge.

If 8 3/4 hours is inadequate, then we take the dollars being sunk into oil perpetuation and rechannel them into making it adequate.

Oh....and the winter part of your equation? It isn't ambient heat being stored, it's solar energy. That much I do know.
 

Luis G

<i><b>Problemator</b></i>
Staff member
List of hydroelectric plants in Mexico:
PHP:
name     units       operation startup date        capacity (MW)  localtion
(El Novillo) 	3 	12-Nov-1964 	135 	Soyopa, Sonora
Oviáchic 	2 	28-Ago-1957 	19 	Cajeme, Sonora
Mocúzari 	1 	03-Mar-1959 	10 	Álamos, Sonora
(El Fuerte) 	3 	27-Ago-1960 	59 	El Fuerte, Sinaloa
(Sanalona) 	2 	08-May-1963 	14 	Culiacán, Sinaloa
Humaya 	2 	27-Nov-1976 	90 	Badiraguato, Sinaloa
Bacurato 	2 	16-Jul-1987 	92 	Sinaloa de Leyva, Sinaloa
Raúl J. Marsal
(Comedero) 	2 	13-Ago-1991 	100 	Cosalá, Sinaloa
Luis Donaldo Colosio
(Huites) 	2 	15-Sep-1996 	422 	Choix, Sinaloa
Boquilla 	4 	01-Ene-1915 	25 	San Francisco Conchos, Chihuahua
Colina 	1 	01-Sep-1996 	3 	San Francisco Conchos, Chihuahua
La Amistad 	2 	01-May-1987 	66 	Acuña, Coahuila
Falcón 	3 	15-Nov-1954 	32 	Nueva Cd. Guerrero, Tamaulipas
Infiernillo 	6 	28-Ene-1965 	1,000 	La Unión, Guerrero
Villita 	4 	01-Sep-1973 	280 	Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán
Cupatitzio 	2 	14-Ago-1962 	72 	Uruapan, Michoacán
Cóbano 	2 	25-Abr-1955 	52 	Gabriel Zamora, Michoacán
Platanal 	2 	21-Oct-1954 	9 	Jacona, Michoacán
Botello 	2 	01-Ene-1910 	13 	Panindícuaro, Michoacán
Tirio 	3 	01-Ene-1905 	1 	Morelia, Michoacán
Bartolinas 	2 	20-Nov-1940 	1 	Tacámbaro, Michoacán
Itzícuaro 	2 	01-Ene-1929 	1 	Peribán los Reyes, Michoacán
Zumpimito 	4 	01-Oct-1944 	6 	Uruapan, Michoacán
San Pedro Porúas 	2 	01-Oct-1958 	3 	Villa Madero, Michoacán
Puente Grande 	4 	01-Ene-1912 	17 	Tonalá, Jalisco
Colimilla 	4 	01-Ene-1950 	51 	Tonalá, Jalisco
Luis M. Rojas
(Intermedia) 	1 	01-Ene-1963 	5 	Tonalá, Jalisco
Juntas 	3 	01-Ene-1923 	15 	Guadalajara, Jalisco
Manuel M. Diéguez
(Santa Rosa) 	2 	02-Sep-1964 	61 	Amatitlán, Jalisco
Jumatán 	4 	17-Jul-1941 	2 	Tepic, Nayarit
Valentín Gómez Farías
(Agua Prieta) 	2 	15-Sep-1993 	240 	Zapopan, Jalisco
Aguamilpa 	3 	15-Sep-1994 	960 	Tepic, Nayarit
Carlos Ramírez Ulloa
(El Caracol) 	3 	16-Dic-1986 	600 	Apaxtla, Guerrero
Ambrosio Figueroa
(La Venta) 	5 	31-May-1965 	30 	La Venta, Guerrero
Colotlipa 	4 	01-Ene-1910 	8 	Quechultenango, Guerrero
Portezuelos I 	4 	01-Ene-1901 	2 	Atlixco, Puebla
Portezuelos II 	2 	01-Ene-1908 	1 	Atlixco, Puebla
Fernando Hiriart Balderrama
(Zimapán) 	2 	27-Sep-1996 	292 	Zimapán, Hidalgo
Mazatepec 	4 	06-Jul-1962 	220 	Tlatlauquitepec, Puebla
Temascal 	6 	18-Jun-1959 	354 	San Miguel Soyaltepec, Oaxaca
Chilapan 	4 	01-Sep-1960 	26 	Catemaco, Veracruz
Camilo Arriaga
(El Salto) 	2 	26-Jul-1966 	18 	Cd. Maíz, San Luis Potosí
Encanto 	2 	19-Oct-1951 	10 	Tlapacoyan, Veracruz
Electroquímica 	1 	01-Oct-1952 	1 	Cd. Valles, San Luis Potosí
Micos 	2 	01-May-1945 	1 	Cd. Valles, San Luis Potosí
Minas 	3 	10-Mar-1951 	15 	Las Minas, Veracruz
Texolo 	2 	01-Nov-1951 	2 	Teocelo, Veracruz
Manuel Moreno Torres
(Chicoasén) 	8 	29-May-1981 	2,400 	Chicoasén, Chiapas
Malpaso 	6 	29-Ene-1969 	1,080 	Tecpatán, Chiapas
Belisario Domínguez (Angostura) 	5 	14-Jul-1976 	900 	Venustiano Carranza, Chiapas
Ángel Albino Corzo
(Peñitas) 	4 	15-Sep-1987 	420 	Ostuacán, Chiapas
José Cecilio del Valle
(El Retiro) 	3 	26-Abr-1967 	21 	Tapachula, Chiapas
Bombaná 	4 	20-Mar-1961 	5 	Soyaló, Chiapas
Tamazulapan 	2 	 12-Dic-1962 	2 	Tamazulapan, Oaxaca
Schpoiná 	3 	07-May-1953 	2 	Venustiano Carranza, Chiapas
El Durazno (S.H. Miguel Alemán) 	2 	01-Oct-1955 	0 	Valle de Bravo, México
Ixtapantongo (S.H. Miguel Alemán) 	3 	29-Ago-1944 	0 	Valle de Bravo, México
Santa Bárbara (S.H. Miguel Alemán) 	3 	19-Oct-1950 	0 	Santo Tomás de los Plátanos, México
Tingambato (S.H. Miguel Alemán) 	3 	24-Sep-1957 	0 	Otzoloapan, México
Tepazolco 	2 	16-Abr-1953 	0 	Xochitlán, Puebla
Las Rosas 	1 	01-Ene-1949 	0 	Cadereyta, Querétaro
Tuxpango 	4 	01-Ene-1914 	0 	Ixtaczoquitlán, Veracruz
Huazuntlán 	1 	01-Ago-1968 	0 	Zoteapan, Veracruz
Ixtaczoquitlán 	2 	01-Ene-1902 	0 	Ixtaczoquitlán, Veracruz
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
Hoover Dam alone generates more than 4 billion kilowatt-hours a year - enough to serve 1.3 million people.

The Palo Verde plant is the largest nuclear energy generating facility in the United States. It is located about 50 miles west of Phoenix in Tonopah, Arizona. The facility is on about 4,000 acres. Approximately 2,500 people are employed there.

In 2000 the Palo Verde nuclear plant generated 30.4 million megawatts of power.
About 4 million people in California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas receive power generated by the Palo Verde plant.


Palo Verde is the only nuclear energy facility in the world that uses treated sewage effluence for cooling water.

Palo Verde does not use fossil fuels to generate electricity. It is a zero-emissions facility.

The reactors at Palo Verde are in an airtight, reinforced concrete structure designed to withstand the force of a jet airplane.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
SouthernN'Proud said:
And your degree in engineering is from what university again?

I'll admit it. I have zero idea how it works, how well it works, what the capacities for storing solar energy are, the collection methods...none of it. I know it is a potential source, that it is renewable, clean and ain't likely to run out anytime soon. Beyond that, I must defer to those with the specific knowledge.

If 8 3/4 hours is inadequate, then we take the dollars being sunk into oil perpetuation and rechannel them into making it adequate.

Oh....and the winter part of your equation? It isn't ambient heat being stored, it's solar energy. That much I do know.

My knowledge comes from living in AZ & hearing about Solar for most of my life.

The angle of the sun & the amount of time is insufficient for anybody above, about 38° except during midsummer. It's not terribly efficient since it's heating water but it's not likely to run out in time to hurt humans. It takes gross amounts of infrastructure to "store".

It's a desert solution, not an American one.

We need desalination plants along the coasts.
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
Gonz said:
My knowledge comes from living in AZ & hearing about Solar for most of my life.

The angle of the sun & the amount of time is insufficient for anybody above, about 38° except during midsummer. It's not terribly efficient since it's heating water but it's not likely to run out in time to hurt humans. It takes gross amounts of infrastructure to "store".

It's a desert solution, not an American one.

We need desalination plants along the coasts.


There's that engineering degree at work. Yup, the only way to use the sun is to heat water. Duh!

Here's a thought, Gonz. Coils of black tube covering most of your roof. It preheats water, even during the winter. That water is then run through a heat exchanger. It then is used to provide hot water to the house. Water that usually needs little or no additional heat source to provide for showers, washing dishes, clothes, etc. How much electricity would that save? Enough, perhaps, over the size of a neighbourhood to take an entire oil generating plant offline. And it works, right here in Montreal, all winter long.

Solar cells. They work, better or worse, all year long. Added to the roof of homes, they'd supply how much power per neighbourhood? Enough to take another oil plant off line?

Solar doens't need to answer all the demand itself. Anymore than wind, hydro, or oil does. But you run the renewables up to full capacity before you engage the non-renewable ones. And instead of sinking more money into non-renewable, you put your R&D bucks into making the renewables better.

You want desalinisation plants? Not a problem. Build them in tandem with tidal generators. Two for one. Not to mention the power you need for the desalinisation is right there at your fingertips.
 

JJR512

New Member
In case anyone is confused by the numbers (I was at first)...

The Hoover Dam gernerates 4,000,000,000,000 watts. That's four billion kilowatts, or four million megawatts.

The Palo Verde nuclear plant generates 30,400,000,000,000 watts. That's 30.4 billion kilowatts, or 30.4 million megawatts.

The nuclear plant produces about 7.6 times as much power as the dam, but they're only serving about three times as many people.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
5.3 million covers most of the AZ & NM population base. Add the El Paso region & the southeastern Cali desert communities & you're near 100% coverage.
 

Professur

Well-Known Member
JJR512 said:
In case anyone is confused by the numbers (I was at first)...

The Hoover Dam gernerates 4,000,000,000,000 watts. That's four billion kilowatts, or four million megawatts.

The Palo Verde nuclear plant generates 30,400,000,000,000 watts. That's 30.4 billion kilowatts, or 30.4 million megawatts.

The nuclear plant produces about 7.6 times as much power as the dam, but they're only serving about three times as many people.

Now finish the math and add in the industries supplied.
 
Top