Oh, by the way

jimpeel

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
You have the same equal right to take a meaty schlong down your throat or up your ass just like they do. No one is denying anyone that right.
 
spike

spike

New Member
We're talking about the right for anyone to marry any consenting adult that they want. The right for these couples to be covered by their partners insurance, visit in the hospital, etc.

You know, equal rights.
 
ResearchMonkey

ResearchMonkey

Well-Known Member
spike said:
We're talking about the right for anyone to marry any consenting adult that they want. The right for these couples to be covered by their partners insurance, visit in the hospital, etc.

You know, equal rights.
Click to expand...
A man and a man =/= man and woman. Cats and dogs, apple and oranges.

Why limit it to just consenting adults? Why just two? Why just humans? Civil unions, have fun.
 
Gonz

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
oh, for the record, any adult is not entitled to marry any adult. there are limitations.
 
Winky

Winky

Well-Known Member
Stickin' yer pee pee in another man's pooper ain't natural
and no amount of Liberal boolshitte is ever gonna change that.
 
jimpeel

jimpeel

Well-Known Member
spike said:
We're talking about the right for anyone to marry any consenting adult that they want.
Click to expand...

The reason that we have laws which deny the marriage of cousins, brothers, sisters, fathers, and mothers is because of the genetic aspects of such unions and the devastating effect it has on offspring.

However, this genetic aspect is not a factor in relationships which cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, produce offspring.

Should homosexual brothers be able to marry? Should a father be allowed to marry his son? A mother her daughter? A sister her sister? If not, why not? If so, why so?

If they are disallowed, is that not discrimination against those who cannot produce idiot children?

If they are allowed, isn't that granting them more rights than other people? Where is the "equality" then?
 
spike

spike

New Member
ResearchMonkey said:
A man and a man =/= man and woman. Cats and dogs, apple and oranges.
Click to expand...

Yes, black does not equal white either. But all people should have the freedom to marry any consenting adult that they want. I don't know why you would want a nanny state to limit your American's freedoms.

Why limit it to just consenting adults? Why just two?
Click to expand...

Marriage takes consent. Adults are able to give consent for marriage. Why just two? I don't care if it's more than two.
 
spike

spike

New Member
Gonz said:
31 states, voters allowed to vote for homosexual marraige.

31 states reject such a union.

oh for 31, send 'em back to the minors.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it took awhile for women and blacks to get equal rights under the law too.
 
spike

spike

New Member
jimpeel said:
The reason that we have laws which deny the marriage of cousins, brothers, sisters, fathers, and mothers is because of the genetic aspects of such unions and the devastating effect it has on offspring.

However, this genetic aspect is not a factor in relationships which cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, produce offspring.

Should homosexual brothers be able to marry? Should a father be allowed to marry his son? A mother her daughter? A sister her sister? If not, why not? If so, why so?

If they are disallowed, is that not discrimination against those who cannot produce idiot children?

If they are allowed, isn't that granting them more rights than other people? Where is the "equality" then?
Click to expand...

You're stretching for a genetic argument where there is none. Genetics has nothing to do with the bigotry against homosexual marriage.
 
Winky

Winky

Well-Known Member
Stickin' yer pee pee in another man's pooper ain't natural
equating humans with animals doesn’t change that fact
one wit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top