SouthernN'Proud said:1. It's a private school. They can decide who attends and who doesn't.
2. Both parents cannot be lesbians. It's a biological fact. Both adult caregivers might be, and might do a damn fine job, but they are not both parents. Like it or not, a male had to be involved somewhere in this process.
Ontariochcr said:Remember when this used to be America?
Ontario, California.catocom said:Ontario
1. Sure...and they're trying to promote Christian living and hopefully do so by getting as many kids as possible into their program. I suppose the girl could always find another school.SouthernN'Proud said:1. It's a private school. They can decide who attends and who doesn't.
2. Both parents cannot be lesbians. It's a biological fact. Both adult caregivers might be, and might do a damn fine job, but they are not both parents. Like it or not, a male had to be involved somewhere in this process.
Stob wrote that school policy requires that at least one parent may not engage in practices "immoral or inconsistent with a positive Christian life style, such as cohabitating without marriage or in a homosexual relationship," The Los Angeles Times reported in Friday's edition.
Shay and her parents said they won't fight the ruling.
ash r said:and
2: there might not have been a male actively involved, as in the case of artificial insemination.
They were probabaly working on that until outright cloning took over the front runner position. Don't put it past the beaker and test tube community to muck with anything and everything.SouthernN'Proud said:The day you can derive sperm from a female, you have an argument; not until.
chcr said:Remember when this used to be America?
I guess that'd be back when blacks and jews weren't allowed in "better" clubs, huh?Gato_Solo said:Yep. I also remember when people actually abided by the rules of a private institution, instead of trying to circumvent them.