Search results

Is that a new euphemism for titties? "Fat babies" If so...count me in. Those 'fat babies' are insane! ;)

Typical... some but-job threathening Bristol Palin is more comment-worthy than a continuation of a Korean war..with both North and South Korea holding nukes and your own Navy sitting in between the two. Pass the beer nuts. DWtS is on.

d'ya know of any place where driving 80mph is legal?

http://news.yahoo.com/video/business-15749628/23165777 North Korea decided to take a few pot-shots on South Korea and SK fired back, of course. Nasty piece of work, that. They're officially still at war since their cease-fire in the 50's

If the food that you grow and sell can't be traced back to you in case you poison someone then you can go on poisoning people to your heart's content? Free Speech Free Press Free Poisoning! Not GVT control, Gonz. Legal agreements signed onto in order to do business. The bits of S510...

You mean like DWI laws? It's okay to let people drive while sauced out of their gourds because it's okay right up until the actually hit someone? Driving while on the phone is more dangerous than DWI. http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/DrivingAssessment2003.pdf Even if you are...

The Senate voted this week 74 to 25 to proceed with S.510 Food Safety Act, which gives FDA more power to recall product and require stricter standards for keeping food safe. This had operators of smaller farms and advocates for locally produced food worried that the bill’s requirements would...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0EC14YP4gA&feature=related

Burma is a country...though it's now known as Myanmar Hong Kong is part of China - though not completely - yet Panama is a country The Virgin Islands used to belong to USA and Spain as I recall...now it's part of Costa Rica Georgia is a country, as is Croatia but Chechnya is still part of...

Yer right... pilots should have some serious background checks done on them before they go anywhere near a plane full of people though- updated quarterly. Drug/booze screening daily and a yearly psych eval. I'd ask the same of politicians (plus a FISCAL body-cavity search to boot) - though...

**Adding Luis' ideo of highlighting text Highlight the text... Canada USA Mexico Panama Costa Rica El Salvador Columbia Venezuela Bresil Ecuador Peru Chile (Chi Chi Chi Le le le!) Argentina Cuba Bahamas Jamaica Haiti Dominican Republic Peurto Rico The UK (Britain, Ireland, Scotland) Portugal...

You mean that 9/11 made y'all paranoid and...terrorized you? Say it ain't so.

So...you can use the Walmart RFID tag to tell if I'm wearing their underwear or going commando? Ye Gods!! _ Your credit/debt card is the best way to keep track of your purchases and patterns. Your license plate + description is the best way to track your car and Facebook is the best way to track...

:shrug: - I'll type it up in Word and copypasta

Backscatter and other screening methods already in use do nothing for C4/Semtex inserts. You'd need a body-cavity search for that...or worst considering the idea of using sub-dermal implants instead. Profiling doesn't always work, but profiling should stop your Granny from getting felt up for...

You want to be scared, Gotho - try looking up MEMS

Most RFID have problems being encased in metals...they also lose a LOT of range attempting to read them 'edge on' - that is, not being immediately parallel to the chip with your reader. Being in a car..I'd put the best effective range at 10' for RFID...which means that if you can spit on it...

Wasn't about to interfere with your experiment. :D :lurk:

+1

The automatic choice for the person being screened is Body Scanner vs Pat-down. Just asking for the pat-down shouldn't have caused a ruckus... trying to raise some hell and get some press-time out of it should get you some hassle.