Search results

I wonder if they will be deported since they don't deserve to be here after that

I did not know they wanted the US to lose the war on terrorism. I thought they felt the war in Iraq was unjustified and that there are those who are on the right or moderates who agree and feel it can be fought in a more efficient manner. So glad it got cleared up

:lol: Cool maps. :D

I am not saying I disagree here but I would say both sides of the coin are guilty of this. Both sides refuse to hear the other side, both sides refuse to hear anything they don't want to and gobble up what the politicans or whatever cause tells them to take up. The right do it as much as the...

Would be ideal I say. Though the death penalty? Why not let her run with other inmates who know (through word or otherwise) what she did? Save the tax payers but she gets justice done to her

She is a sick fuck?

Probably the most accurate and truthful statement that this thread is going to have on it. And all media outlets have a bias. Some are stronger than others.

:rofl:

That I can agree with

Sexy nuns. I can't imagine it :eek6:

They got their jobs and know what the job requires. Why are they acting this way now?

I can give a good argument for gun control: Blame the person that pulled the trigger, the gun itself only did what the person behind it did. It is a tool for hunting or for protection. Oh wait. That is an argument saying people are responsible for their own actions. Not gun control...

Indeed it would. The problem is that as soon as we do it, they will point it out and say that they can use it. Which again I do not want them to be able to do it to anyone. But it gives them the check to be able to I won't say they aren't using it all, but again the tortures will generally...

Just remember Gato: Congress is the opposite of progress

You are right in that they check the intel as much as they can though often times with tortures, they will more likely get the bad intel than good. Why not use what intelligence and analysis we have and use that? We don't hear a great deal but by us doing this, it gives them the right to...

The last part, he mentions fighting all those who have used torture. I did not say I wanted the attacks to occur, but to look at previous attacks and to use what we know about those patters, use what we know about the groups. I did not say to let them attack and use the aftermath. Know thine...

I'd say though he should be totally familiar with it and what goes in before he opposes it. It seems again like he is doing it because it is the in thing. Like him, I oppose it but I said why. He only said he does not know the technicalities of it and opposes it (seemingly because his party...

It can depend upon the person but generally, the information has been wrong or been what the people wanted to hear and was inaccurate or totally wrong. It can also help the terrorists gain some credibility and thus make it easier for them to recruit (and especially for those who were tortured)...

Just aim carefully and you won't have that problem

I am not only against it because we are supposed to be above it, but it gives information that may actually (and often times) is not useful: They are saying only what the interrogaters WANT to hear. And they actually DO condemn the terrorism. Why should we torture when there are better...