Another one bites the dust
- Thread starter jimpeel
- Start date
2minkey
bootlicker
yes, batting 1000 for the few examples you care to count. you're a real scholar there jim.
2minkey
bootlicker
golly jim i'm not going to do your homework for you. you're the dimbulb making globalizing assertions from two examples.
suggest you find bankruptcy figures by industry sector and compare that rate to bankruptcy rates among those aided by obama and co.
of course you will not do that because you lack the faculties er facilities to conduct such inquiry from your cash register.
too bad... you should get a job in information retrieval. i'm sure gothy knows all of their locations, so he could help you out.
jimpeel
Well-Known Member
IE: "I can't name one."
2minkey
bootlicker
nice attempt to excuse yourself from responsibility for your own assertions. and a reflection of your lame epistemology.
this is not a matter of "one example," but rather a matter of whether there is a larger pattern that is truly indicative of fault, rather than being a reflection of broad marketplace risks.
i'll leave you to continue making a bird's nest from tiny scraps of paper.
by the way, esteemed literary giant, i.e. is the correct usage.
this is not a matter of "one example," but rather a matter of whether there is a larger pattern that is truly indicative of fault, rather than being a reflection of broad marketplace risks.
i'll leave you to continue making a bird's nest from tiny scraps of paper.
by the way, esteemed literary giant, i.e. is the correct usage.
jimpeel
Well-Known Member
That's okay. I can't name any Obama successes either so you are not alone on that one.
WTF?
i.e. I'll run away now.
Oh, my, I believe that I have been chastised.
2minkey
bootlicker
um, jim, i know it is very difficult for you to look at the bigger picture and put things into context when you are laser-focused on ideological pettiness, but lemme try to explain it to you.
if the firms helped by obupkis + pals have not been failing at a rate that exceeds the typical rate of failure in that industry sector, then your critique is unfounded.
i would expect that this kind of speculative bullshit is EXACTLY what private capital gets shy about because it is risky; however the much greater risk is in NOT pursuing any and all viable alternatives to sharif's black gold and continuing to have to put up with his and his cousins' shit.
listing one-off successes and failures does nothing to establish larger and ACTUALLY MEANINGFUL patterns. it's as if you found a rabid squirrel in your yard and then launching a global campaign to declare squirrels the most vile and dangerous disease vector in human history, and systematically destroy all of the little fuckers.
perhaps this is not the best example though, since they are tree rats, and actually could become a serious risk under the right conditions. but you know what i mean. er, no, you still don't. that i'm mixing economy and epidemiology doesn't help either. lemme see if i can steal some coloring books from the local pediatrician's office, and then maybe we could get you started on the right track.
(before anyone knee-jerks and says something like "the government should not be involved in any of that!" please recall that that is not the point under discussion, and that by yanking it sideways you are only yanking your choad. which is nevertheless exactly what i expect two of you in particular to do. soon. don't disappoint me, boys.)
if the firms helped by obupkis + pals have not been failing at a rate that exceeds the typical rate of failure in that industry sector, then your critique is unfounded.
i would expect that this kind of speculative bullshit is EXACTLY what private capital gets shy about because it is risky; however the much greater risk is in NOT pursuing any and all viable alternatives to sharif's black gold and continuing to have to put up with his and his cousins' shit.
listing one-off successes and failures does nothing to establish larger and ACTUALLY MEANINGFUL patterns. it's as if you found a rabid squirrel in your yard and then launching a global campaign to declare squirrels the most vile and dangerous disease vector in human history, and systematically destroy all of the little fuckers.
perhaps this is not the best example though, since they are tree rats, and actually could become a serious risk under the right conditions. but you know what i mean. er, no, you still don't. that i'm mixing economy and epidemiology doesn't help either. lemme see if i can steal some coloring books from the local pediatrician's office, and then maybe we could get you started on the right track.
(before anyone knee-jerks and says something like "the government should not be involved in any of that!" please recall that that is not the point under discussion, and that by yanking it sideways you are only yanking your choad. which is nevertheless exactly what i expect two of you in particular to do. soon. don't disappoint me, boys.)
Winky
Well-Known Member
Solar is not an option
"risk is in NOT pursuing any and all viable alternatives to sharif's black gold"
and that would be nuclear, coal and more efficient utilization
not windfarms and solar energy companies that are merely front groups
for the Democratic party's campaign contributions.
"risk is in NOT pursuing any and all viable alternatives to sharif's black gold"
and that would be nuclear, coal and more efficient utilization
not windfarms and solar energy companies that are merely front groups
for the Democratic party's campaign contributions.
2minkey
bootlicker
everything that has a clear ROI should be pursued.
the problem is that it's a bitch to really construct a solid ROI case for any huge technical system. and then things get ugly. folks have no idea how much of a politician edison had to become in order to get his larger systems built.
the problem is that it's a bitch to really construct a solid ROI case for any huge technical system. and then things get ugly. folks have no idea how much of a politician edison had to become in order to get his larger systems built.
Winky
Well-Known Member
That's true there must be some large system that could be profitable
and viable that isn't being built and could only come about as a
direct result of government involvement.
yanno for the life of me I really can't?
Just another crack pipe dream like hi-speed rail?
Honestly name something that needs building
that would be profitable.
and viable that isn't being built and could only come about as a
direct result of government involvement.
yanno for the life of me I really can't?
Just another crack pipe dream like hi-speed rail?
Honestly name something that needs building
that would be profitable.