PuterTutor said:
Well, that case is fucked up. Guess I'm glad I'm in Missouri where we can still oppress our teenagers, although it's 11pm in Owensville. Anyway, I still don't think the leading to beastiality is a valid argument though, you are still talking two consenting adults. A dog or a child cannot consent. I think that is and needs to stay pretty well universal.
And how long do you think your cerfew would stand up to a human rights council challenge? Or anyone's cerfew?
If I knew it would stay between two consenting adults, I'd be first in line to support it. But, when quebec allowed it, at first, how many people do you think crossed the border to get married? Most of them. Well, when they get home, what happens to that marriage? Most places, legally, recognise out of state marriages. What happens when the consenting age is lower? Like the drinking age in Que being lower than that of NY, ONT, or just about anywhere else?
What happens when the legalities of it become so muddled with Int'l policy? The entire system breaks down. And if you don't think that someone's gonna deliberately persue that angle, the look up at the now-seperating 5 day old lesbian couple. And you know as well as I do, once this shit gets broke, it doesn't get fixed.