Brazilians will be forced to use RFID chips and GPS trackers in their cars

seems like there could be a lot of fun had with deliberate misinformation. but, watch out for the peener police!!!
 
SOURCE

Wal-Mart Radio Tags to Track Clothing

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. plans to roll out sophisticated electronic ID tags to track individual pairs of jeans and underwear, the first step in a system that advocates say better controls inventory but some critics say raises privacy concerns.

Starting next month, the retailer will place removable "smart tags" on individual garments that can be read by a hand-held scanner. Wal-Mart workers will be able to quickly learn, for instance, which size of Wrangler jeans is missing, with the aim of ensuring shelves are optimally stocked and inventory tightly watched. If successful, the radio-frequency ID tags will be rolled out on other products at Wal-Mart's more than 3,750 U.S. stores.

"This ability to wave the wand and have a sense of all the products that are on the floor or in the back room in seconds is something that we feel can really transform our business," said Raul Vazquez, the executive in charge of Wal-Mart stores in the western U.S.

Before now, retailers including Wal-Mart have primarily used RFID tags, which store unique numerical identification codes that can be scanned from a distance, to track pallets of merchandise traveling through their supply chains.

Wal-Mart's broad adoption would be the largest in the world, and proponents predict it would lead other retailers to start using the electronic product codes, which remain costly. Wal-Mart has climbed to the top of the retailing world by continuously squeezing costs out of its operations and then passing on the savings to shoppers at the checkout counter. Its methods are widely adopted by its suppliers and in turn become standard practice at other retail chains.

But the company's latest attempt to use its influence—executives call it the start of a "next-generation Wal-Mart"—has privacy advocates raising questions.

While the tags can be removed from clothing and packages, they can't be turned off, and they are trackable. Some privacy advocates hypothesize that unscrupulous marketers or criminals will be able to drive by consumers' homes and scan their garbage to discover what they have recently bought.

They also worry that retailers will be able to scan customers who carry new types of personal ID cards as they walk through a store, without their knowledge. Several states, including Washington and New York, have begun issuing enhanced driver's licenses that contain radio- frequency tags with unique ID numbers, to make border crossings easier for frequent travelers. Some privacy advocates contend that retailers could theoretically scan people with such licenses as they make purchases, combine the info with their credit card data, and then know the person's identity the next time they stepped into the store.


"There are two things you really don't want to tag, clothing and identity documents, and ironically that's where we are seeing adoption," said Katherine Albrecht, founder of a group called Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering and author of a book called "Spychips" that argues against RFID technology. "The inventory guys may be in the dark about this, but there are a lot of corporate marketers who are interested in tracking people as they walk sales floors."

Smart-tag experts dismiss Big Brother concerns as breathless conjecture, but activists have pressured companies. Ms. Albrecht and others launched a boycott of Benetton Group SpA last decade after an RFID maker announced it was planning to supply the company with 15 million RFID chips.

Benetton later clarified that it was just evaluating the technology and never embedded a single sensor in clothing.

Wal-Mart is demanding that suppliers add the tags to removable labels or packaging instead of embedding them in clothes, to minimize fears that they could be used to track people's movements. It also is posting signs informing customers about the tags.

"Concerns about privacy are valid, but in this instance, the benefits far outweigh any concerns," says Sanjay Sarma, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "The tags don't have any personal information. They are essentially barcodes with serial numbers attached. And you can easily remove them."

In Europe some retailers put the smart labels on hang tags, which are then removed at checkout. That still provides the inventory-control benefit of RFID, but it takes away other important potential uses that retailers and suppliers like, such as being able to track the item all the way back to the point of manufacture in case of a recall, or making sure it isn't counterfeit.

Wal-Mart won't say how much it expects to benefit from the endeavor. But a similar pilot program at American Apparel Inc. in 2007 found that stores with the technology saw sales rise 14.3% compared to stores without the technology, according to Avery Dennison Corp., a maker of RFID equipment.

And while the tags wouldn't replace bulkier shoplifting sensors, Wal-Mart expects they'll cut down on employee theft because it will be easier to see if something's gone missing from the back room.

Several other U.S. retailers, including J.C. Penney and Bloomingdale's, have begun experimenting with smart ID tags on clothing to better ensure shelves remain stocked with sizes and colors customers want, and numerous European retailers, notably Germany's Metro AG, have already embraced the technology.

Robert Carpenter, chief executive of GS1 U.S., a nonprofit group that helped develop universal product-code standards four decades ago and is now doing the same for electronic product codes, said the sensors have dropped to as little as seven to 10 cents from 50 cents just a few years ago. He predicts that Wal-Mart's "tipping point" will drive prices lower.

"There are definitely costs. Some labels had to be modified," said Mark Gatehouse, director of replenishment for Wrangler jeans maker VF Corp., adding that while Wal-Mart is subsidizing the costs of the actual sensors, suppliers have had to invest in new equipment. "But we view this as an investment in where things are going. Everyone is watching closely because no one wants to be at a competitive disadvantage, and this could really lift sales."

Wal-Mart won't disclose what it's spending on the effort, but it confirms that it is subsidizing some of the costs for suppliers.

Proponents, meanwhile, have high hopes for expanded use in the future. Beyond more-efficient recalls and loss prevention, RFID tags could get rid of checkout lines.

"We are going to see contactless checkouts with mobile phones or kiosks, and we will see new ways to interact, such as being able to find out whether other sizes and colors are available while trying something on in a dressing room," said Bill Hardgrave, head of the RFID Research Center at the University of Arkansas, which is funded in part by Wal-Mart. "That is where the magic is going to happen. But that's all years away."

Write to Miguel Bustillo at [email protected]
 
SOURCE

Facts about RFID tags don't add up to Big Brother

Laura HellerLaura Heller
Jul 28th 2010 at 11:00AM

Ever since Walmart announced it would be attaching RFID tags (radio-frequency ID tags) to certain apparel items, there's been quite a bit of confusion about what these devices can do, or how the devices might violate shoppers' privacy. Will these little radio frequency tags really let Walmart track you outside the store, compile data about your shopping habits, or let thieves know what's inside your home?

Not according to the retail technology experts we've spoken with.

In case you're late to the story, Walmart plans to use RFID tags in some apparel, namely jeans and underwear. The tags transmit information about the product, much like a bar or UPC code, except in this case they're called electronic product codes, or EPCs. It's just a lot more detailed data than price and product number. Retailers have been developing and implementing the technology for years, and using it to great success to help streamline the supply chain and control inventory.

RFID tags attached to pallets of products let everyone involved track a shipment. The technology tells not just where the delivery is, much like a tracking number on a package, but records things like whether that pallet was left out in the elements for any length of time. It helps reduce damaged goods and in theory, elevates the user's ability to protect against spoiled or dangerous merchandise. RFID is a growing tool that retailers and product manufacturers use to operate more efficiently and lower costs.

But RFID hasn't been used in individual products, until now.

Leave it to Walmart to break new technological ground and freak everyone out in the process. Let us pause for a moment and separate some fact from fiction.

Fact
The information on RFID tags can only be read by a compatible reader close by, as they can only transmit information about 8 feet. And it's in a code. Anyone trying to use a reader not programmed for Walmart won't get anything.

Fact
Yes, the tags will continue to transmit after the item leaves the store, but not for long. RFID tags operate on a battery and batteries die.

Fact
RFID doesn't add any costs to a purchase, certainly not any that is being passed along to customers. The average cost of a tag is just 7 cents, less if purchased in bulk as Walmart is likely doing.

Fact
No one is likely to troll the streets getting signals from your purchases. As great as RFID technology promises to be, it's not infallible or foolproof. Getting information off the tags isn't always easy and things like water and metal interfere with the signal. So any claims that someone riding around with a scanner getting information from tags sitting in garbage cans seems pretty far-fetched. At the very least, those bins need to be plastic, located in an arid climate, and with no liquid in the same container. Even then, the only information a thief would get was the item number.

It would be a lot easier and a lot more efficient to dig through that trash and find the UPC code on a receipt than steal a scanner or hack into Walmart's database and drive around looking for perfect conditions.

RFID promises quite a few benefits for retailers and consumers.

"Right now it's really about in-store management and keeping the product in stock," Bill Hardgrave, incoming dean of the College of Business at Auburn University, said in a phone interview. "They are using it to enhance the shopping experience."

In the future, RFID will let us pay for items without waiting in a checkout line, says Hardgrave -- all the tagged items in a cart can be read at the exit and your account charged. Stuck in the dressing room with the wrong size? A terminal or hand-held device in the room could locate the correct size or color, and request it be brought to you.

These are future uses, but today, stores like Walmart are using RFID to reduce the costs of doing business. Walmart's claims that it helps reduce the cost of employee theft have merit. Back room disappearing acts will be harder to pull off. And while RFID tags won't deter shoplifters, it will better help detect what items leave the store, helping Walmart better manage inventory levels and implement more meaningful ways to deter thieves in specific product categories.

And here's something to be happy about: The technology helps retailers do things like keep better track of inventory. "Have you ever gone into a store and couldn't find something, and people working there were clueless? RFID tags will actually find the item," explains Bill Schover, editorial director at the In-Store Marketing Institute in an interview. "What's not to like?"

Conspiracy theorists and privacy advocates have concerns that Walmart will use RFID to track people, especially since some states have begun putting smart chips on driver's licenses. As mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article (subscription required), some fear that purchase history could be paired with a personal electronic ID, creating a profile for each shopper for marketing purposes.

"You can't deny the possibility that your whole shopping history is on that tag, but it seems a little far fetched," says Schover. "But there are opinions, there are points of view, and then there are facts. It's not so much the retailers that know about you, it's the independent research companies."

"Walmart probably knows less about people's shopping and purchase behavior than those retailers that have loyalty programs," points out Mike Troy, editor of Retailing Today, a retail industry resource. "Programs that you are choosing to participate in." Walmart has no such program.

Airlines, credit cards, grocery stores or other retailers all collect data from loyalty club members. Opting in may bring deals, but you also relinquish some privacy. If you really want to remain anonymous, pay cash, don't join any clubs and stop worrying about the tag in your underwear.
 
So...you can use the Walmart RFID tag to tell if I'm wearing their underwear or going commando? Ye Gods!!
_
Your credit/debt card is the best way to keep track of your purchases and patterns. Your license plate + description is the best way to track your car and Facebook is the best way to track you. :D
 
Back
Top