But he's not a liar

HomeLAN

New Member
He just spins the facts.

The Pantagraph has a message for Michael Moore, creator of the movie hit, "Fahrenheit 9/11":

If he wants to "edit" The Pantagraph, he should apply for a copy-editing job and not simply show made-over and "falsely represented" pages from the newspaper in his movie -- or he should at least ask for permission first.

Source
 
I think this is hysterical. The man makes a movie using whatever bits and pieces he can come up with, then actually fabricates parts to make it even more damning. I really, really hope this destroys any credibility that the man had left.
 
I was sure to e-mail that article to my liberal friend in New Mexico. She actually thinks I should see Fahrenheit 9/11.
 
PuterTutor said:
I think this is hysterical. The man makes a movie using whatever bits and pieces he can come up with, then actually fabricates parts to make it even more damning. I really, really hope this destroys any credibility that the man had left.

it's not about objectivity, it's about what certain people want to see :shrug:

i haven't seen it. i'm not a great bush fan, but i don't feel like waisting time on any more lies. there's enough of that already...
 
Shadowfax said:
it's not about objectivity, it's about what certain people want to see :shrug:

i haven't seen it. i'm not a great bush fan, but i don't feel like waisting time on any more lies. there's enough of that already...
Hear, hear!
 
Shadowfax said:
it's not about objectivity, it's about what certain people want to see :shrug:

i haven't seen it. i'm not a great bush fan, but i don't feel like waisting time on any more lies. there's enough of that already...
That would be fine if it was marketed as a movie. Even as an Expose'. It was marketed as a Documentary. To me that means that it contains all factual information, not fabrications. Don't get me wrong, I don't care for Bush much either now, and I might just enjoy this movie if it was marketed as a movie, for entertainment purposes.
 
Gonz said:
Finally somebody with the cajones to take his lies on head to head.

Copyright infringement has nothing to do with lying..it has to do with using someone else's material without giving credit where it's due.
 
PuterTutor said:
That would be fine if it was marketed as a movie. Even as an Expose'. It was marketed as a Documentary. To me that means that it contains all factual information, not fabrications. ...I might just enjoy this movie if it was marketed as a movie, for entertainment purposes.

If that were the case far fewer would have bitched.
 
Back
Top