Can you believe it?

2minkey said:
my omission of the mom was simply because she's fuckin' dead. obviously both parents share the blame. even if he had objections, maybe the dad was too much of a pussy to put a stop to the whore emulation. so fuck him, too.
Click to expand...

Nice. Shows real thinking ability to attack the parents because you didn't like their choice. I may not agree with their choice, but they didn't kill their daughter...

2minkey said:
you may now go back to your sucky sucky, G.I.
Click to expand...

Even better...Attack me, personally, because I don't agree with your rather flimsy argument. Here's an idea...Perhaps you should see a councelor to address your hostility.
 
Gato_Solo said:
Nice. Shows real thinking ability to attack the parents because you didn't like their choice. I may not agree with their choice, but they didn't kill their daughter...
Click to expand...


I believe my comment had more to do with the "dressing her up like a whore" than whomever happened to kill her. I don't think i said anyhting conclusive on that.

Gato_Solo said:
Even better...Attack me, personally, because I don't agree with your rather flimsy argument. Here's an idea...Perhaps you should see a councelor to address your hostility.
Click to expand...

i wasn't really making much of any argument. i simply commented that dressing your little daughter up as a whore is pretty shitty.

though you're obviously looking for an argument, as you've had a hard on for nearly every comment i've made lately, elevating it into something ridiculous. maybe i was suggesting that you, sir, need therapy, and perhaps a little SUCKY SUCKY would make you less testy.
 
Using child and whore in the same sentence seems pretty harsh to me.

She was dressed to look like an adult in a beauty pageant. That's just wrong.
 
True...I never saw Jonbenet in a metallic leopard print tube dress.

I would say they dressed her more like a tart.
 
chcr said:
One wonders if you've ever seen a whore. That's not what they dress like.
Click to expand...

i have, but someone had to point her out to me. someone also had to point out that someone was offering me crack on the same block.

let me rephrase to "dressing up kids in age-inappropriate clothing is a shitty thing to do."

I guess "bimbo" or "tammy fae-ish" would work too.

in any case it's kinda icky. kids should be kids for a while.
 
2minkey said:
I believe my comment had more to do with the "dressing her up like a whore" than whomever happened to kill her. I don't think i said anyhting conclusive on that.
Click to expand...

Your post implied culpability for her death on the parents because of the way she dressed. Do you even read what you type? :rolleyes:

2minkey said:
i wasn't really making much of any argument. i simply commented that dressing your little daughter up as a whore is pretty shitty.

though you're obviously looking for an argument, as you've had a hard on for nearly every comment i've made lately, elevating it into something ridiculous. maybe i was suggesting that you, sir, need therapy, and perhaps a little SUCKY SUCKY would make you less testy.
Click to expand...

Sorry. I didn't know your comments had to be elevated. Perhaps a bit of counseling is in order for you, as you seem to be obsessed with my "hard on" and "SUCKY SUCKY"...
 
Gato_Solo said:
Your post implied culpability for her death on the parents because of the way she dressed. Do you even read what you type? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

and that's exactly what i'm talking about.

"implied culpability." big fancy words. talk about a mountain out of a molehill.

i'm not on the stand.

i'm not running for office.

*yawn*

and, anyway, i fail to see "implied culpability."

"even if daddy didn't do it, he should be beaten for parading his kid around like a little *tart*." (edited for the sensitive)

there are two things there
-an implication that daddy should be punished if he did it (killed her)
-a suggestion that he should be punished (regardless of whether or not he killed her) due to his inappropriate "tart-ification" of his daughter.

while both statements refer to the same two individuals, they are not causally connected. the latter statement does nothing to suggest blameworthiness of da-da in the former; that is still very much an open issue despite mister creep-o coming forward and saying something like he was "not innocent" but not exactly saying he was the one or one of the folks who were party to the death of the little girl. and that's irrelevant here. my suggestion that da-da should be punished for what amounts to a lousy parenting decision and a glorious expression of poor taste does not mean that i am asserting a firm position either way in whether or not dad did it. the only thing close to an assertion of culpability that could reasonably be extracted form my statement is "daddy coulda done it" and that's no more than anyone else has been saying for YEARS, and certainly nothing definitive. you're reading waaaaay too much into what i say.
 
well with the flimsyness of the confession, daddy still might have done it.

anyway mommy and daddy should have been arrested for exploiting their daughter the way they did.
 
Altron said:
I'm still really confused. wtf is going on?
Click to expand...

JonBenet Ramsey little girl, entered by her parents in all kinds of little girl beauty pagents killed in her home at christmas.

Investigation goes no-where, parents are typical white upper class snobery go lawyer up and refuse to be interviewed by police, DA, police, and parents make it a pissing contest instead of an investigation, killer is never caught.

(parents ARE suspects, no arrests ever made due to double jeapordy, don't want them to go free IF they did do it, and the evidence isn't sufficiate)

media whoring attention dies down, we all forget about it....


some nutball confesses, media goes nuts reports like crazy, seem let down when his confession doesn't ring true, he was a few states away when the crime occured, etc.

but since the media brought it up, we can now watch specials on 9/11, Jon Benet and whatever tragedy makes the networks the most money.
 
A free ride home from Thailand. First class accomodations to boot.

LOS ANGELES (AFP) - Former JonBenet Ramsey murder suspect John Mark Karr was cleared of child pornography charges after prosecutors said they did not have enough evidence to go ahead with a trial, reports said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prosecutors at the Sonoma Supreme Court in northern California said the charges would have to be dropped after they decided they could not prove the 41-year-old had used a computer pivotal to the case, several media outlets reported.
Click to expand...

Source

This is the legal system we want to allow terrorists to use? I wonder if OJ needs a partner?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top