Flashback: Hacked Emails Reveal ‘Washington-Approved’ Plan to Stage Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria

Gotholic

Well-Known Member
Edit: It appears the e-mails are fake:


Flashback: Hacked Emails Reveal ‘Washington-Approved’ Plan to Stage Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria

Obama administration complicit in war crime?

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
August 26, 2013 (republished from January 28, 2013)

UPDATE: Britam has admitted that it was hacked but denied that the emails released by the hacker were genuine. Click here for a statement by a Britam spokesman.

Alleged hacked emails from defense contractor Britam reveal a plan “approved by Washington” and funded by Qatar to stage a chemical weapons attack in Syria and blame it on the Assad regime, fulfilling what the Obama administration has made clear is a “red line” that would mandate US military intervention.

The leaked emails, obtained by a hacker in Germany, feature an exchange (click here for screenshot) between Britam Defence’s Business Development Director David Goulding and the company’s founder Philip Doughty;

Phil​
We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.​
We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.​
Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?​
Kind regards​
David​
The fact that the plan involves delivering a CW (chemical weapon) that is “similar to those Assad should have,” clearly suggests that the idea is to stage a false flag chemical weapons attack that could be blamed on Assad by Gulf states like Qatar and NATO powers.

If the claim that such as plot was “approved by Washington” can be verified, then the Obama administration is complicit in a war crime.

According to Cyber War News, which details the process of how the emails were hacked and includes screenshots of the leaked documents, the hack also uncovered, “extremely personal information,” including copies of passports of Britam employees, some of whom appeared to be mercenaries.

A full list of all the hacked documents can be found here. One software systems administrator who analyzed the ‘header’ details from the email in question concluded, “I have to admit that the email does indeed look genuine….all these facts check out. So with Mythbusters objectivity I have to call this one plausible.”

Online business profiles confirm that both David Goulding and Philip Doughty work for Britam Defence.

Last year, reports began to circulate that that US-backed rebel fighters in Syria had been given gas masks and were willing to stage a chemical weapons attack which would then be blamed on the Assad regime to grease the skids for NATO military intervention.

Soon after in August, President Barack Obama warned that the use or even transportation of chemical weapons by the Assad regime would represent a “red line” that would precipitate military intervention. French President Francois Hollande followed suit, stating that the use of such weapons “Would be a legitimate reason for direct intervention.”

At around the same time, a source told Syrian news channel Addounia that a Saudi company had fitted 1400 ambulance vehicles with anti-gas & anti-chemical filtering systems at a cost of $97,000 dollars each, in preparation for a chemical weapons attack carried out by FSA rebels using mortar rounds. A further 400 vehicles were prepared as troop carriers.

The attack would be blamed on the Syrian Army and exploited as an excuse for a military assault. A March 2012 Brookings Institution report entitled Saving Syria: Assessing Options For Regime Change outlined this very scenario – where a manufactured humanitarian crisis would be cited as justification for an attack.

Yesterday, Israel’s vice premier Silvan Shalom told reporters that if Syrian rebels obtained chemical weapons from stockpiles belonging to the Assad regime, such a development would force Israel to resort to “preventive operations,” in other words – a military strike on Syria.

In December, a shocking video emerged of Syrian rebels testing what appeared to be a form of nerve gas on rabbits, bolstering claims that the rebels had already obtained chemical weapons.

As Tony Cartalucci also highlights, “Mention of acquiring chemical weapons from Libya is particularly troubling. Libya’s arsenal had fallen into the hands of sectarian extremists with NATO assistance in 2011 in the culmination of efforts to overthrow the North African nation . Since then, Libya’s militants led by commanders of Al Qaeda’s Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) have armed sectarian extremists across the Arab World, from as far West as Mali, to as far East as Syria.”

Last month, 29 different US-backed Syrian opposition groups pledged their allegiance to Al Nusra, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated group which, as the New York Times reported, “killed numerous American troops in Iraq.

Numerous reports confirm that Al Nusra is the leading front line fighting force in Syria and is commanding other rebel groups. Given their prominent role, allied with the fact that the terror group has been responsible for numerous bloody attacks in Syria, the notion that the Obama administration would approve a plot that could see chemical weapons fall into the hands of Al-Qaeda terrorists could represent a foreign policy scandal even bigger than Benghazi-Gate.

In a related story, the Syrian Electronic Army, a separate hacktivist group, continues to release hacked files and emails from numerous sensitive foreign ministry and military websites belonging to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, including emails sent between these countries.

*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

Source

And let's not forget about the babies being taken from the incubators either during the Gulf War.

More info and the explanation of the why the U.S. wants to attack Syria:

Edit: These two videos are still relevant:


 
I have one question...what would the purpose be of invading (use any term you like) Syria? They didn't threaten
to off our former President. They didn't shoot at our planes while under a no-fly zone mandate. They didn't specifically
harbor terrorists who attacked us (though, they have their share). So, at the present time, why?
 
yet another episode of "if 2minkey and gonz agree you must be suggesting some pretty absurd shit."

but rest assured, gotholic in no way believes anything we've ever done was for the stated reasons. everything is an enigma, wrapped inside a mystery, shoved up the twat of a thai sex worker who secretly works for the company.

i as well would like to understand which strategic priority of the US or the cabal that controls everything would be served by such an action.
 
I have one question...what would the purpose be of invading (use any term you like) Syria? They didn't threaten
to off our former President. They didn't shoot at our planes while under a no-fly zone mandate. They didn't specifically
harbor terrorists who attacked us (though, they have their share). So, at the present time, why?

Proxy war with Iran. They want Iran to get involved for an excuse to attack them. I added two great vids on this in the OP.
 
Rivero makes some great points:

Michael Rivero asks:

1. Why would Syria’s Assad invite United Nations chemical weapons inspectors to Syria, then launch a chemical weapons attack against women and children on the very day they arrive, just miles from where they are staying?

2. If Assad were going to use chemical weapons, wouldn’t he use them against the hired mercenary army trying to oust him? What does he gain attacking women and children? Nothing! The gain is all on the side of the US Government desperate to get the war agenda going again.

As I type these words, US trained and equipped forces are already across the border into Syria, and US naval forces are sailing into position to launch a massive cruise missile attack into Syria that will surely kill more Syrians than were claimed to have died in the chemical attack.

Last time there was a chemical weapon attack in Syria, Bush administration office Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson said that he thought Israel might have given chemical weapons to the Syrian rebels to frame the government.

British MP George Galloway just floated the same theory in regards to the new chemical weapon attack.

Of course, we don’t know who carried out the attack, or what weapon was used.

But given the well-documented fact that the U.S. has been planning regime change in Syria for 20 years straight – and planned to use false ploys for 50 years – it is worth being skeptical until all of the evidence is in.

To which I will add Ryan Dawson's question:

Why would Assad need to use chemical weapons when he has all but defeated the hired mercenaries using conventional forces?

Source
 
Oh-Sambo can't start world war three fast enough, I mean I told you shit was gonna get weird and you didn't believe me.
 
just go hide with gotholic in his mom's basement. there's plenty of comic books down there to keep you busy.
 
We don't need a proxy war with Iran. They've done enough in Iraq to warrant invasion.

So, Syria has WMDs (I wonder what Russian truck they got them from?).
A)If we attack & "get lucky", killing Assad in a missile strike, who takes over;
and,
B)who gets the WMDs?
 
israel is the end game here. the crazies that get the WMDs won't hesitate to use them in ways the syrian gov would not.
 
We don't need a proxy war with Iran. They've done enough in Iraq to warrant invasion.

So, Syria has WMDs (I wonder what Russian truck they got them from?).
A)If we attack & "get lucky", killing Assad in a missile strike, who takes over;
and,
B)who gets the WMDs?

Wow. Just wow. I guess you didn't read the article nor see the two vids. Everything indicates the rebels did it. Just as the evidence suggests the rebels used gas before. The U.N. should first complete their investigation at least. What did Iran do to warrant an invasion? By the way, did you read about how the U.S. helped Iraq use chemical weapons against Iran that has recently come to light? Obama needs congressional approval before he does anything. However, Syria is no threat to the U.S. and so should mind its own business.

You do know the U.S. used chemical weapons in Iraq, right?

And why would Assad invite the U.N. inspectors in and then use chemical weapons on the same day they arrive? But not only use them, but NOT use them against the rebels? Why use chemical weapons anyway when he is winning? He is not stupid. He wouldn't want an international outrage.

Iran wants to sell their oil not in U.S. dollars. That threatens the petrodollar. Iraq did the same thing and Libya wanted to replace the dollar with the dinar. Look what happened with them. It wasn't about WMDs or the misquote of Gaddafi.

Iran would get involved because the U.S. knows Syria and Iran have mutual defense agreements. If the U.S. attacks Syria then Iran will get involved. Oh, and Russia and China backs Iran.

Welcome to World War 3.
 
Evidence? I see haphazard allegations. Of course, "but a generation ago" is certainly damning.

I agree with Welcome to WW3. If we go down this path, it quite possibly will be exactly that.
Do you plan on playing Tokyo Rose on the radio?

I looked at some more "evidence"
" A chemical weapon can be "any chemical which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm".
FIUCKING GUNPOWDER!!!! The goddamned American military used FUCKING GUNPOWDER to attack the enemy
 
you gonna dodge the draft?

The powers that be wouldn't want to implement the draft. By doing so it would force people to pay attention and start mass antiwar demonstrations ala Vietnam. Most people don't know what is going on nor do they care as it is not affecting them just yet. As long as they have their twinkies, all is good.
 
Evidence? I see haphazard allegations. Of course, "but a generation ago" is certainly damning.

I agree with Welcome to WW3. If we go down this path, it quite possibly will be exactly that.
Do you plan on playing Tokyo Rose on the radio?

I looked at some more "evidence"
" A chemical weapon can be "any chemical which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm".
FIUCKING GUNPOWDER!!!! The goddamned American military used FUCKING GUNPOWDER to attack the enemy

Gunpowder?

BANG!

BANG!

BANG!

BANG!

BANG!

BANG!
 
The powers that be wouldn't want to implement the draft. By doing so it would force people to pay attention and start mass antiwar demonstrations ala Vietnam. Most people don't know what is going on nor do they care as it is not affecting them just yet. As long as they have their twinkies, all is good.


nice dodge. dodge it is.
 
there wouldn't be a need for a draft besides it would all be over long before you could start one up take the fatties off the couches run them thur some kinda basic and trundle their still fat Wal-Mart asses on to the field to use them as cannon fodder. Them jews got those two hundred nukes ready to go at a moments notice, the twinkie twerkers would never arrive in time to be part of the party. I'm trying to imagine what the gas prices would get up to though :p
 
The only reason those Destroyers should be there, is for Israeli backup.
We have absolutely NO interest in Syria.
The admin has let them fight it out for years, now all the sudden they
don't like it because they regime supposedly use chemicals?
Smells like diversion to me, about all the other Real scandals
because of the congressional break.

I hope the now (silent somewhat) grass roots, that got hot with the
tea party last time don't lose focus.
 
Back
Top