Liberals are telling us that homosexuality is normal and “just another life style choice.” They tell us that those that make fun of or otherwise do harm to homosexuals based on their sexual preference are guilty of a Hate-Crime.
Liberals are demanding that homosexuals be allowed to marry and live their life openly in the light of day.
Liberals have told us for years that extramarital sexual behavior was personal, the individual’s private life, and just about sex.
Liberals told us that having extramarital sexual relationships using the power and influence of public office, and conducted on Government property was no big deal as long as no one was hurt and it was a consensual relationship.
Liberals told us that the improper or even criminal activity of someone that was married and shook his finger at America and denied any extramarital sexual involvement was OK--- even if it was a lie told to a Federal Grand Jury because it was “just about sex."
Liberals are constantly telling us that people are to be considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. And, that they should not be forced to resign from office, or even important committee appointments.
So, where is this liberalism in practice where Larry Craig is involved?
OK, you got me! That is a good post. Very insightful, on point, and you do indeed have a point, (if one doesn't look to far beneath the surface anyway), so I will answer it.
We, and I believe I speak for the majority of liberal minded people, dont have a problem with him doing whatever he likes in his bedroom so long as he isn't hurting anyone. The touble is, when a GOP senator, who is anti gay rights, is married, and then commits a crime in the bathroom in pursuit of extramarital, homosexual contact with a stranger, it tends to look not only unethical, immoral, and pathetic, it is downright hypocritcal as well.
Hell I wouldn't care if he was gay, had a wife, for a beard
* And had discreet male lovers, so long as when it came out, he handled it with class, didn't try and deny it, accepted responsibilty, and was a "man" about it. As long as he wasn't one of those closeted self loathing gays that denies it to himself, and takes it out on the gay community with anti gay legislation, then goes and secretly engages in homosexuality. Those types are despicable and they should not hold office. I do have sympathy even for them. It's got to be damn hard to have those kind of tastes and desires, and to have been taught to hate it. Ultimately they come to hate themselves for having that kind of sex drive, and it's sad that they are doomed to a miserable double life. What they need is a lot of therapy, not to be elected to a political office.
* A person who diverts suspicion from someone (especially a woman who accompanies a male homosexual in order to conceal his homosexuality).
