Global warming's effect on hurricane strength disputed in new report

Professur said:
And, of course, we all learned about him from Connections, right Chcr?
It was a good episode, but I knowed 'bout 'im afore thayat.
 
Bomb Earth's atmosphere with sulphur, researcher says
Shock and awe campaign on global warming
By Thomas C Greene in Washington
Published Tuesday 1st August 2006 09:36 GMT

Firing artillery shells into the stratosphere to release sulphur particles could defeat global warming, climate researcher Paul Crutzen says.

In a paper to be published in the journal Climatic Change in August, the professor will explain his scheme in greater detail.

So far we have learned, from this press release, that sulphur particles can reflect sunlight well enough to lower the Earth's temperature, if that ever becomes necessary.

Crutzen reckons that the effect would last about two years. He bases this on observations of the Mount Pinatubo eruption in 1991, which released significant quantities of sulphur into the atmosphere and may have lowered the Earth's average temperature by 0.5 degrees Celsius. Or not.

Crutzen says he doesn't think of "climate engineering" as a first-line response to global warming, but if governments fail to enact the proper controls for greenhouse gas emissions, it might become a necessary emergency measure.

What could possibly go wrong? Oh, heaps of things. Very little is known about how sunlight affects weather patterns, so fiddling with it could result in anything from minor changes to catastrophic droughts throughout the world's most fertile regions.

On the other hand, we might already have come to depend on "global dimming" from air pollution to keep global warming at bay, so this artificial volcano idea might be the way back from disaster.

There is evidence suggesting that recent efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has caused a spike in global temperatures over the past decade. Without our protective layer of industrial pollutants, the Earth's atmosphere is now reflecting less solar radiation, and temperatures are rising. We could be rendering the planet uninhabitable just because we're afraid of a little shmutz in the air.

The message, then, that air pollution is good for the Earth, will no doubt resonate deeply with the Bush administration. And while the Bushies have been hostile toward the idea of global warming, certainly the idea of attacking a complicated problem with heavy artillery will appeal to them so strongly that we might see some action soon. ®

Source
 
But, but .... it'll be cold acid rain.

My point in a nutshell. A climatologist ... who knows nothing about geology .... and completely missed the billions of tons of dust and ash accompanying the sulfer outta Pinatubo.
 
U.S. forecasters lower predictions, expecting 7 to 9 hurricanes this season
By JESSICA GRESKO




MIAMI (AP) - The 2006 Atlantic hurricane season should be slightly less active than originally predicted, federal forecasters said Tuesday.

Forecasters now expect there to be 12 to 15 named storms and seven to nine hurricanes, the National Hurricane Center and other National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration agencies said. Three or four could be major hurricanes with sustained winds of at least 111 mph (178 km/h), forecasters said.

Government scientists made their first prediction in May, saying the season could produce 13 to 16 named storms, and eight to 10 hurricanes, four to six of which could become major.

There have been only three tropical storms and no hurricanes so far, but August through October are typically the most active months of the season.

Forecasters warned coastal residents not to let their guard down.

"Preventing the loss of life and minimizing property damage from hurricanes are responsibilities shared by all," said Max Mayfield, director of the National Hurricane Center. "Remember, one hurricane hitting your neighbourhood is enough to make it a bad season."

Federal Emergency Management Agency director R. David Paulison, who joined NOAA officials speaking from Washington, D.C., said his agency is working closely with state governments and would not wait for a state's relief efforts to fail before stepping in with federal support after a hurricane.

Officials revised their forecast because of wetter than predicted conditions over the Pacific Ocean, which forced slightly stronger upper-level winds over the Caribbean, hurricane centre meteorologist Christopher Landsea said. Those winds can rip apart storms and stop them from becoming hurricanes.

Water temperatures in the Atlantic also are not as high as first expected, forecasters said.

The revision follows that of forecasters at Colorado State University, who updated their forecast Thursday. They reduced their storm estimate from nine hurricanes to seven, and said that three instead of five of the storms could be major. The forecasters initially had called for 17 named storms but now predict 15.

The two forecasts still would make this season busier than long-term averages, but in line with an increase in the Atlantic that started in 1995. Federal forecasters say warmer waters, more moisture and other conditions have been responsible for that increase, which could last for another decade or longer.

Between 1995 and 2005, the Atlantic has averaged 15 named storms, just over eight named hurricanes and four major hurricanes, according to the hurricane centre. Long-term averages are 11 named storms, six hurricanes and two major ones.

The 2005 hurricane season broke records with 28 named storms, 15 hurricanes and seven major ones. Hurricane Katrina was the costliest natural disaster in U.S. history, killing more than 1,500 people and wiping out parts of the Gulf Coast.

Hurricane season began June 1 and ends Nov. 30.

Source

So much for that.
 
I'm glad to see that their understanding of the various proccesses involved it so complete. I feel so secure now...
 
Back
Top