who's "they" though?
Where do you draw the line between freedom and a 1984-like litigation Big brother / nanny state fascism?
Where is the line between the natural common sense to be a human being and to have the intelligence and pride and self respect, both for yourself and for others, that should be cherished, not attacked - a mix between responsibility and real freedom?
and where is the line drawn on regulation, balance, sustaining law and order in a reality where intelligence, and responsibility and self worth are not, sadly, universal givens?
Do we now take that balance so far into every realm of life that there can be and never will be anymore any freedom, nor hope of freedom as we currently know it, nor aspect of our lives not open to regulation nor law, nor litigation?
Must our children not be allowed to walk in the valleys, or the coastal paths, or in the hills or on the fells or the lakesides because of restrictive cost or over-protective fear?
Is that it?
The ability to wander out into the country, to experience quiet and nature, to go walking and to breathe fresh air -
you wish to ban this, to regulate it? To make it only a privelged niche for the rich and for those that can afford the Insurance or the helicopter / rescue back-up teams?
Anyone that votes 'aye' here, had better not say one goddamn word about 'PC' to me here -
Time to grow up and stand up! - and learn you cannot have it each and every way at the same time-
If you vote for ever increasing regulation and control - do not argue elsewhere about either the increasing encroachment on us all, nor argue about political correctness gone mad -
if you vote yes to this - you are a very nasty part of the madness.
That's not personal - that's just the truth - this isn't a 'pick and mix'.
sheesh!