I don't think its too much about oil really, but just like when the guys on the right jump on the bandwagon and claim its about 'liberating' the people, I think those opposed should have a right to use after thoughts like oil as an arguement as well. Its about the economy! Its about that the way the economy is, and that presidents don't get second terms when they are like this. Its about the fact a 'war hero' presidents can sometimes squeak by even in a weak economy. Its about diversion, its about changing the news from unemployment, double dip recession, layoffs, and no end in sight to the economic worries, to something else, anything else. Just like when ol' Billy lit up those asprin factories in Sudan when Monica was in the media. You know what, I think we need to further restrict term limits. That would change EVERYTHING. ONE TERM thats it! Give em one 6 year term and kick em out. That would eliminate this need to do drastic and irrational things in an attempt to get reelected!
As I have said before, its about reelection plain and simple! There are some issues on the side, and no one can dismiss the benefits to the vice pres in this matter, but its not the primary issue. Just like 'liberating people' almost certainly couldn't be under any twisted argument one could possibly come up with. It's secondary, if even that! We know its not about WMDs, we know its not about 'liberating people' so what's left? If it was about WMDs we'd have went to NK first, if it was about "liberating" people there are dozens of other places we could go. But Americans don't like Arabs, especially after 9/11. So lets capitalize on this, and go to war with some Arabs. Nobody like Saddam, lets go to war with him, everyone knows we can find a hundred reasons to justify it. Thats the thought process, and thats why we are where we are today!