I think you should look up some more things about civilians, enemy combatants, and uniformed soldiers before you start using the POW line. Uniformed enemy soldiers are POW's when they surrender or are captured. The uniform can be as little as a scarf tied around one arm, provided that everyone in that group wears the same color scarf on the same arm. Hence the term uniform, and the inherant rights under the Geneva Convention for uniformed soldiers. Un-uniformed soldiers are not accorded the same rights as uniformed because there is no way of telling them apart from the civilian population. If the US would have arrested and detained everyone in Afghanistan, you'd have an extremely good argument, but, since most Afghani's are still running around loose in their own country, your argument starts to fray at the edges. The soldiers who are in Afghanistan are not police. They take fire from house A, they have 2 choices. Level house A, or turn and run. If house A is being led by house B, then they have a third option. Take everyone in house B prisoner, then house A can be taken without destroying their real-estate. War isn't nice, and the situation that the US is in isn't nice, either. We are fighting an enemy that doesn't follow the rules of engagement, or the Laws of Armed Conflict. We do, so to minimize the deaths of thousands, we take a few hundred prisoner. Law, lawyers, and testimony comes later. Always has. The US has treated every prisoner, if not perfectly, at least better than they had lived before in Afghanistan where they were captured. Get off your high horse, and take a good look at the world around you. It's ugly right now, to be sure, but when the dust settles, it'll still be here, spinning it's way through time and space, and people like me, who've actually seen some of the things you only read about, will still be here, too. Shout until you're blue in the face, but it won't change anything. Until you're willing to do something, then jobs like mine, and people like me, will always be here.