ResearchMonkey
Well-Known Member
Yes, you do have a problem with the facts in religion and politics.
OMG!! Did he just say what I think he said....Why yes he did!!! "I know you are, but what am I"!!! Absolutely astounding!!
Yes, you do have a problem with the facts in religion and politics.
OMG!! Did he just say what I think he said....Why yes he did!!! "I know you are, but what am I"!!! Absolutely astounding!!
So what you are saying here is that shock and awe
would have been far more awesome if one nuke
was used instead?
I assure you the Iranians are no where near being able to build one
of those. On the other hand, the Israelis do have over 200+ deliverable nukes.
I'd say cato is already doing a fantastic job of handing you your ass on a platter.Come debate the facts over in the religious discussion RM. That would be cool if you worked with facts at some point.
IF they obtain the capability to produce a nuke I don't think they will use a missile for delivery. I would bet on a parked munition, or several. I certainly do not question their intents.Launching a nuclear missile strike against Israel
would be suicide. I personally think that Iran
is many years away from having this capability.
I'd say cato is already doing a fantastic job of handing you your ass on a platter.
Cato has agreed with me on quite a few of the religious points. You were just proven wrong with a quickness.
So Cato agrees with you that Christians slaughtering non-Christians presents a serious threat to the American way of life under the Constitution of the United States.
Who said that? Is that a desperate straw man?
But christians even kill fellow christians because of religion. Remember that abortion doc that got murdered in church?
Fuckin'A Mark, we do agree on somethings.I reserve the right to kill anyone I feel like!
Oh wait, god gave me free will, so I reserve the right to exercise it in any and all matters!