Iraq again

[ris]

very true, but the whole thrust of the dossier points out his past actions as precedent for stopping his future actions. he's never taken part in any covert actions such as this with weapons of mass desruction.

his previous uses have both been well known [marsh kurds in 1988 and iranians during the war]. the reality is he threatens stability of the region and has a history of using such weapons on neighbours which is why he should be removed. to my knowledge that is the main thrust of the uk dossier.

 

[Gonz]

this is not intended to be inflamatory but why is their having nukes ok and other countries not? the proliferation of the weapon is supposed to be restricted but some countries seem to be ok [india and pakistan are always niggling each other but there seems to be no concern they might use them on each other] and others not.

if there is a rule set then it should be applied equally

Before the WTC attacks, India & especially Pakistan wereon the UN & US shit list. They weren't supposed to have nukes. LL was right, Israel is a democratic society which has not shown opressive aggression towards a neutral country. That, and they are surrounded by countries that wish them to vaporize into history.