ris
New Member
very true, but the whole thrust of the dossier points out his past actions as precedent for stopping his future actions. he's never taken part in any covert actions such as this with weapons of mass desruction.
his previous uses have both been well known [marsh kurds in 1988 and iranians during the war]. the reality is he threatens stability of the region and has a history of using such weapons on neighbours which is why he should be removed. to my knowledge that is the main thrust of the uk dossier.
his previous uses have both been well known [marsh kurds in 1988 and iranians during the war]. the reality is he threatens stability of the region and has a history of using such weapons on neighbours which is why he should be removed. to my knowledge that is the main thrust of the uk dossier.