is there a Santa Claus?

Dave

Well-Known Member
IS THERE A SANTA CLAUS?

1. No known species of reindeer can fly. BUT there are 300,000 species of living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only Santa has ever seen.

2. There are 2 billion children in the world. BUT since Santa doesn't appear to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist children that reduces the workload to 15% of the total - a mere 380 million children according to the Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that's 91.8 million homes, one presumes there's at least one good child in each!

3. Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical). This works out to 822.6 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back into the sleigh and move on to the next house. Assuming that each of these 91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false but for the purposes of out calculations we will accept), we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75-1/2 million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least once every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc.
This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For the purposes of comparison, the fastest man-made vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second - a conventional can run, tops, 15 miles per hour!

4. The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized Lego set (2 pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight. On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting the "flying reindeer" (see point #1) could pull TEN TIMES the normal amount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even nine. We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload - not even counting the weight of the sleigh - to 353,430 tons. Again, for comparison - this is four times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth ship.

5. 353,000 tons travelling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance - this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as a spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second! Each! In short, they will burst into flames almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team will be vaporised within 4.26 thousandths of a second. Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500,061 times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force.

In conclusion - If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he's dead now!
 

Leslie

Communistrator
Staff member
The conclusion is WRONG. Santa is magic. None of this applies. :p

Avery got his letter from Santa/Canada Post last week. I get home from work and he runs up and waggles it in my face and says, "Now I have PROOF that Santa is real!". He was sooooooo happy!

It'll probably be the last year for him, so I'm gonna enjoy it while I can.
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
My kid doesn't want Santa to be a myth. Nor do I...

"DEAR EDITOR: I am 8 years old. Some of my little friends say there is no Santa Claus. Papa says, 'If you see it in THE SUN it's so.' Please tell me the truth; is there a Santa Claus?

VIRGINIA O'HANLON.
115 WEST NINETY-FIFTH STREET."


VIRGINIA, your little friends are wrong. They have been affected by the skepticism of a skeptical age. They do not believe except [what] they see. They think that nothing can be which is not comprehensible by their little minds. All minds, Virginia, whether they be men's or children's, are little. In this great universe of ours man is a mere insect, an ant, in his intellect, as compared with the boundless world about him, as measured by the intelligence capable of grasping the whole of truth and knowledge.

Yes, VIRGINIA, there is a Santa Claus.

He exists certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist, and you know that they abound and give to your life its highest beauty and joy. Alas! How dreary would be the world if there were no Santa Claus! It would be as dreary as if there were no VIRGINIAS. There would be no childlike faith then, no poetry, no romance to make tolerable this existence. We should have no enjoyment, except in sense and sight. The eternal light which childhood fills the world would be extinguished.

Not believe in Santa Claus! You might as well not believe in fairies! You might get your papa to hire men to watch in all the chimneys on Christmas Eve to catch Santa Claus, but even if they did not see Santa Claus coming down, what would that prove? Nobody sees Santa Claus, but that is no sign that there is no Santa Claus. The most real things in the world are those that neither children nor men can see. Did you ever see fairies dancing on the lawn? Of course not, but that's no proof that they are not there. Nobody can conceive or imagine all the wonders there are unseen and unseeable in the world.

You tear apart the baby's rattle and see what makes the noise inside, but there is a veil covering the unseen world which not the strongest man, nor even the united strength of all the strongest man that ever lived, could tear apart. Only faith, fancy, poetry, love, romance can push aside that curtain and view and picture the supernal beauty and glory beyond. Is it all real? Ah, VIRGINIA, in all this world there is nothing else real and abiding. No Santa Claus! Thank GOD! He lives, and he lives forever.

A thousand years from now, nay, ten times ten thousand years from now, he will continue to make glad the heart of childhood.
 

MrBishop

Well-Known Member
My kid doesn't want Santa to be a myth. Nor do I...

It's a great story, but what always got me about that article/letter is that he's supposed to be writing to an 8 year old but it's more like he's writing to the 30-50 year old readers instead.

"Papa..what's skepticism mean?"
:eek3:
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
They were smarter then. Ever seen the writings of an 8th grade child from the 1800s? Puts our college graduates to shame.
 

Leslie

Communistrator
Staff member
There's nothing there an average 8 year old shouldn't be able to comprehend. Perhaps children of today would have to have it read to them rather than read it themselves, but they'd surely understand it. Back then, absolutely it would have been understood, and a child would have likely spoken herself in that same manner. Regardless, for the language-deprived youth of today, there's nothing better than learning a new word or learning to decipher the meaning of a phrase.

Who avoids "big" words in case a child perhaps won't know it? :confuse3: That is utterly against children's best interests, and dumbing down degrades and undermines their abilities and potential. A word or phrase not understood is another opportunity to learn and expand one's world.
 

Sharky

New Member
There's nothing there an average 8 year old shouldn't be able to comprehend. Perhaps children of today would have to have it read to them rather than read it themselves, but they'd surely understand it. Back then, absolutely it would have been understood, and a child would have likely spoken herself in that same manner. Regardless, for the language-deprived youth of today, there's nothing better than learning a new word or learning to decipher the meaning of a phrase.

Who avoids "big" words in case a child perhaps won't know it? :confuse3: That is utterly against children's best interests, and dumbing down degrades and undermines their abilities and potential. A word or phrase not understood is another opportunity to learn and expand one's world.

QFT
 

Gonz

molṑn labé
Staff member
There's nothing there an average 8 year old shouldn't be able to comprehend. Perhaps children of today would have to have it read to them rather than read it themselves, but they'd surely understand it. Back then, absolutely it would have been understood, and a child would have likely spoken herself in that same manner. Regardless, for the language-deprived youth of today, there's nothing better than learning a new word or learning to decipher the meaning of a phrase.

Who avoids "big" words in case a child perhaps won't know it? :confuse3: That is utterly against children's best interests, and dumbing down degrades and undermines their abilities and potential. A word or phrase not understood is another opportunity to learn and expand one's world.

Yea. Fuckin' A.
 
Top