rrfield
New Member
Gonz said:Don't hold your breath. He's losing credibility by the minute.
We will see. If you lose credibility with one person, you gain it with another.
That's what makes politics fun, the speculation.
Gonz said:Don't hold your breath. He's losing credibility by the minute.
If it had been someone more believeable and intelligent than Kerry, would s/he have taken your vote?SouthernN'Proud said:I contend they voted for the lesser of two evils in their eyes.
W has disappointed me, and I'm a card-carrying Republican. Still, I'd vote for him tomorrow again over whatever his name was...Kerry, that's right.
As to what Americans want, most don't even know what they want. And since when did Warshinton care what Americans want anyway?
MrBishop said:Might as well start crying out "Might makes Right"
MrBishop said:If it had been someone more believeable and intelligent than Kerry, would s/he have taken your vote?
Just curious.
I feel the same way about Dubya. Frankly, the man must've bought his MBA. He can't seem to even explain the most basic of economic priciples without tripping over his own tongue...unless he follows his scripts closely, he strikes me as a buffoon.SouthernN'Proud said:Well, you have to consider that I have seen houseplants more intelligent than Kerry, so...
MrBishop said:anything or anyone who stands opposed to the majority or the GVT currently in power as 'anti-American' .
SouthernN'Proud said:I contend they voted for the lesser of two evils in their eyes.
Opposing GW, or any other party/pol, is not anti-American. Backing the enemy & not following the Constitution is.
The thing is that people who are against Bush and his war are being called for 'supporting the enemy'Gonz said:Backing the enemy & not following the Constitution is.
Better dead than red still applies.
Just curious Mr. B, but what do you think the correct and total coarse of actionMrBishop said:The thing is that people who are against Bush and his war are being called for 'supporting the enemy'
Its a war of words and labels.
Since when does Iraq have anything to do with 9/11?catocom said:Just curious Mr. B, but what do you think the correct and total coarse of action should have been for what happened to the trade centers, and the people in them?
MrBishop said:Most people, even the left, had no issues with taking Afghanistan on for their involvment in 9/11.
So your saying we should have invaded Afghanistan, and then left it at that?MrBishop said:Since when does Iraq have anything to do with 9/11?
Most people, even the left, had no issues with taking Afghanistan on for their involvment in 9/11.
catocom said:Did Iraq have anything to do with 9/11 directly? The jury is still out on that one IMO.
MrBishop said:Bush and his war
MrBishop said:Most people, even the left, had no issues with taking Afghanistan on for their involvment in 9/11.
Gato_Solo said:
I remember the newscasts when we decided to go in. A multitude of College Students (go figure) took to the streets in protest. Mostly out of fear for a draft...It's been like that since Vietnam. The US takes any kind of military action, and the college students go into an anti-war frenzy, forgetting that it's guys like me, who are actually in the military, protecting their right to protest. I call it "Elitest idiocy in action".