chcr said:And once again, we see that somewhere between the oversensationalization of a story by the popular press and the self-righteous denials of those in charge (or those who think they are anyway) is where the truth really lies.
Gato_Solo said:How are those denials 'self-righteous'? Seems to me that everybody who did something untoward was dealt with on a rather rapid basis. It also seems to me that the media, for all their hate of the current administration, is extremely willing to put innocent lives on the line to further their own agenda.
chcr said:The point is that the story, and the immediate denials are part of the same cloth. Spin first and worry about veracity afterward (if at all). Self-righteous indeed, IMO.
Eighteen million men and women were cast into the concentration camps of the Soviet Gulag. They carved canals, highways and railroads through the Russian wilderness, mined gold, uranium and lead, and even designed military aircraft and rockets. Millions of them perished. Russia's modern economy is built, quite literally, on the bones of slaves.
Gato_Solo said:Sorry, but denials of unproven allegations are not 'spin'. They are reactions to an unwarranted attack. Now answer me this...who flushed the Koran down the toilet?
unclehobart said:I did not pee on that Quran with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Despite highly publicized charges of U.S. mistreatment of prisoners at Guantanamo, the head of the Amnesty International USA said on Sunday the group doesn't "know for sure" that the military is running a "gulag."
chcr said:True, but not the point. You think the "powers that be" didn't know about the "Quran abuse" when the story first broke? Sorry, but we don't know the full truth and we never will, but as I said, it clearly lies between the original report and the stories that have followed. In my experience, when a story keeps changing it is wildly unlikely to be correct in any particular. Self- righteous, "we would never do anything like that," denials have been proven to be lies.
freako104 said:I do not think the powers knew except those at Gitmo. The full truth lies between the 2 sides. Remember there are 3 sides to a story: Yours, theirs and the truth which is between the 2.
Gato_Solo said:The 'powers that be' knew, freako. That's why they had people getting 'fired' from guard and interrogator jobs. That's the point that chcr missed. The first question that should've been asked was 'When were these idiots replaced?", and the second question should've been "What steps did you take to ensure that this doesn't happen again?". Niether of those questions, if even asked, were in the actual story. Just the parts that would cause a negative reaction.