Cerise
Well-Known Member
Spike said:....by the actions of a few.
jimpeel said:....any time anyone makes the slightest comment.....
Liberal Guilt.
Spike said:Are we stepping on your toes?
Who are you claiming alliance with?
Spike said:....by the actions of a few.
jimpeel said:....any time anyone makes the slightest comment.....
Spike said:Are we stepping on your toes?
Islamic extremists have created "no-go" areas across Britain where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter, one of the Church of England's most senior bishops warns today.
Writing in The Sunday Telegraph, Bishop Nazir-Ali compares the threat to the use of intimidation by the far-Right, and says that it is becoming increasingly difficult for Christianity to be the nation's public religion in a multifaith, multicultural society. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...Q0IV0?xml=/news/2008/01/06/nislam106.xml#form
The Nazis did not kill IN THE NAME OF RELIGION as Muslims do.
The Ku Klux Klan was not a government entity.
The IRA was not a government entity.
Abortion clinic bombers are not a government entity.
NLFT is not a government entity.
In only one case can you show government involvement but you cannot show anywhere in their religious canons any dictat that they kill infidels.
You cannot show any form of Dhimmihood for non-believers.
You keep placing apples on the table when everyone else is placing oranges and you call them the same thing.
I gave you several examples of GOVERNMENT abuses which have made news in the past few weeks in the mainstream press and you ignore those to -- <sigh> once again -- rail about the isolated kooks and try to show those as being as bad as an entire government entity executing these policies.
When they come for you, you remember to remind them that "I defended you against guys like Peel. I was on your side." as they are taking you to the soccer field. I'm sure that will hold a lot of weight with them and maybe, if you're lucky, they will hang you last.
Liberal Guilt.
Who are you claiming alliance with?
I'd never be able to find atrocities committed by governments made up of mostly christians!
Meek does not equal pushovers. Jesus Himself stood up to those who misused the temples as I recall, and it wasn't a tea party.
next?
Inkara1 said:I'm curious....
It turns out that the vast majority of civilian deaths are caused by Islamic terrorists, and that very few are from American bombs and bullets. This is because (unlike the terrorists) the Americans aren't in Iraq to kill civilians.
Why does IraqBodyCount vilify Americans, who are literally giving their blood to help Iraqis, while protecting the activities of foreign terrorists, who enter the country specifically to kill civilians? Because the website and the terrorists both share an anti-American political agenda to which the lives of innocent Iraqis are nothing more than a supporting prop.
In fact, Iraqis are mere statistics to these folks. And since the value of these statistics is substantially mitigated by presenting the full truth, IraqBodyCount wisely avoids identifying each incident by relevant context.
In short, civilians in Iraq aren't dying from the war. They are being murdered by Islamic terrorists. http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/IraqBodyCount2006.htm
Three weeks before the 2006 midterm elections gave Democrats control of Congress, a shocking study reported on the number of Iraqis who had died in the ongoing war. It bolstered criticism of President Bush and heightened the waves of dread -- here and around the world -- about the U.S. occupation of Iraq.
Virtually everyone connected with the study has been an outspoken opponent of U.S. actions in Iraq.
No matter whether a latent desire to feed the American public's opposition to the war might have shaped these studies, another audience was paying close attention: jihadists who used this research as a justification for killing Americans. http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/databomb/index.htm
you're absolutely correct but this has nothing to do with, say, british killing entire villages of folks in africa over farmland disputes.
unless you approve of economic predation a long way away from home. like, say, the war of yankee aggression...?
BINGO!!!
Are you are finally admitting that you believe the USA military = terrorists?
That sites speaks about the radicalized followers of Islam---those who heed the Koran's word as it was written in 800AD. Those that would seek to destroy America and wipe Israel off the map because of their beliefs. Do you deny that such people exist?
British invasions of Africa are not on the list of things I have spent a lot of time studying, so to provide an intelligent answer I'd need to know what the hey yer talking about.
So it doesn't count unless somebody imagines you saying something specific before the violence?
Nice.