Read this history, and discuss...

Gato_Solo said:
1. Where in my post does it say we know very little about Hitler? I put nothing there that was false or misleading.

2. That's right...similarities. Not between Saddam and Hitler, but between the reactions to both. For the record...Niether Hitler, or Saddam, attacked the US first.
i will note some similarities im ashamed to admit i didnt see between them such as the weapons of mass destruction(hitler you said had an atom bomb plan a manhattan project if you will) under his sleeve which none of my history classes told us about. i dont know whether he still has them in hiding but it is errily similar in that if he does they are damn well hidden. the military i dont know was Iraq told they can have no military power???????? isnt that illegal since itd make them an easy target for any country? i wanted to wait until you responded gato since im stupid and didnt know the purpose of the thread
 
freak said:
which none of my history classes told us about.

One of the reasons that we're beginning to homeschool is the amount of basic education that is no longer taught. Take what you learned in public school & dismiss it. Go find a few books on American &/or World history. You'd be surprised at what they forgot to teach.

Gato-My point in bring the Kennedy clan up was to show that most of our political families have dirt in their background. I dislike Teddy because of his actions & words, not because of Joe. Squiggy should dislike Dubya for the same. The family is irrelevent.
 
Well, obviously, I dislike him and his whole fam damily...:lol: They all did bad things and lied. For the record, I'm not a Ted Kennedy fan by any means...
 
Gonz said:
One of the reasons that we're beginning to homeschool is the amount of basic education that is no longer taught. Take what you learned in public school & dismiss it. Go find a few books on American &/or World history. You'd be surprised at what they forgot to teach.

Gato-My point in bring the Kennedy clan up was to show that most of our political families have dirt in their background. I dislike Teddy because of his actions & words, not because of Joe. Squiggy should dislike Dubya for the same. The family is irrelevent.
i dont like bush or his father as they both have lied. but you know what they say like father like son.i didnt like the idea of how he got in office. but i see what your getting at. and ill admit that what i learned of JFK i like the man. teddy is a drunk bastard(sorry to use such damning terms but i dont see him any other way.)
 
freako104 said:
i will note some similarities im ashamed to admit i didnt see between them such as the weapons of mass destruction(hitler you said had an atom bomb plan a manhattan project if you will) under his sleeve which none of my history classes told us about. i dont know whether he still has them in hiding but it is errily similar in that if he does they are damn well hidden. the military i dont know was Iraq told they can have no military power???????? isnt that illegal since itd make them an easy target for any country? i wanted to wait until you responded gato since im stupid and didnt know the purpose of the thread

hitler's atomic bomb program was reliant on a heavy water plant in norway [i think it was a place called telemark] that the allies and norgegian resistance managed to bomb along with one of the shipments they had. the damage was actually pretty minor but the nazi government became impatient with the delay and instead focused their efforts on the v1 and v2 rocket projects.

germany had massive restrictions in its military size, but so did the rest of europe in an attempt to prevent the escalation of military strength seen in the first world war. germany pretty much openly flouted those restrictions in building battleships such as the bismark, a ship that outgunned anything in the british navy.
it is well acknowledged that the war reparations, both monetarily and through the annexation of areas like the western industrial areas of germany, served to impoverish and humiliate german people and its government. the resultant action of this was the ability for a strong propoganda based party such as the nazi's to achieve power.

hussein certainly attempted to put together a nucleur weapons program in the past but the evidence for a more recent return to that appears to be flimsy. certainly the iaea didn't think he was anywhere near it in the last 12 months.

as far as i know there was no restriction on the size of the iraqi military as such but there restrictions to individual elements, such as the rocket distance restriction that intended to to curb the danger to neighbouring countries. the weapons inspectors discovered a small number of missiles that broke this restriction and were in the process of having them destroyed.
 
Didn't Iraq shoot a few of the scuds that they weren't supposed to have (due to their range) at Kuwait during the war?
 
i never read anything on those scuds that was confirmed by military sources, always press coverage that was conjectural about distance and size of weapon.
 
Back
Top