Religious priority?

Hmmmm. I don't see that at all. In fact, the extent of our national religious freedoms is not allowing our government to make one.

Right there is no basis for sponsoring or favoring one religion over others. That should only mean equality for people of all religions and non-religious folk.
 
....only a minority do, from all the ones I know and have heard.

There is where your ignorance shows. It is right in the Koran. Obviously you know few, and precious little about them, a very common position for most 'mericans.

Just because many radical Muslims are "bad seeds", and I won't for a minute deny it (and neither will my Boss, who is, where if I have questions about muslims, is always happy to answer and bust through the ignorance that previals in this country, and help me understand), doesn't mean that it's not true.

A guy who firebombs an abortion clinic is every bit the terrorist that a guy who suicide bombs something in the middle east is. The only realy difference being that the muslim had the ultimate faith in his convictiosn to die for them, where the "christian" usually doesn't. All the same, both are terrorits, make no mistake, and both need to be stopped.

I can respect (if not agree with), the peaceful, and legal works pro-life people do, but terorism is terrorism, no matter how you dress it up.

Honestly "christianity" was responsible for the first major campaigns of organized terrorsim, but that is conveniently forgotten.
 
There is no point in bothering to try and explain Muslims to you. Tancredo has made it clear that he feels that their religion makes them inherently prone to terrorism, and you've made it clear that you agree with him on most things. Ignorant people have always feared what they do not understand. I can't change that, so although I will speak my mind, I won't even try to change yours. Enjoy your ignorance, I hear it is bliss....
 
well if all you want to do is try to belittle me here without any real debate,
then I'm through on the subject with ya.
 
Fine by me....

It never ceases to amaze me that 'mericans, so convinced that they are right and the rest of the world is wrong, that they refuse to even try and understand any other way than their own, are baffled when others in the world hate us.

You don't like being belittled catocom, but you certainly won't hesitate to do so to a Muslim. Then you wonder why he should have a problem with it.....Go figure!

I've said it time and again, that it's not "most of the world" hating us, and of those who do, many do not have legit reason to, but many do, absolutely do!
 
You don't like being belittled catocom, but you certainly won't hesitate to do so to a Muslim. Then you wonder why he should have a problem with it.....Go figure!

where do you get that from.
Show me where I've said something you believe to be belittling.
 
A guy who firebombs an abortion clinic is every bit the terrorist that a guy who suicide bombs something in the middle east is. The only realy difference being that the muslim had the ultimate faith in his convictiosn to die for them, where the "christian" usually doesn't.

Yes, they are both terrorists. Given your scenario, they both believe enough. The diference is, in one culture, it's commonplace. In the other, it's sacreligious.

Oh, by the way, it's American.
 
where do you get that from.
Show me where I've said something you believe to be belittling.

OK, perhaps belittling was too harsh, but for you to say this:

:bs:
only a minority do, from all the ones I know and have heard.

....is simply ignorance. Do you really presume to tell Muslims what they believe?

http://www.islam-101.org/ said:

To me when you tell me what Muslims you "know" believe, when obviously you don't know your head from your ass on the subject is belittling, but that's just my opinion. But if I was to tell you what most Christians believe and I was talking about killing abortion doctors, I imagine you'd be offended.

All I can say is that I actually know a real life Muslim, and am open minded enough to talk to him and ask questions rather than hold erroneous beliefs based on prejudices. My boss is actually one of the finest people I know, and he personally believes that one can find God though Christianity, or Judaism, or Hinduism, or Buddhism. He personally finds it through the Islam faith that his own parents taught him in his native Morocco. The thing about him is he doesn't presume to play god and judge others. He leaves that to god. To my way of thinking he's a better Christian than many I know.
 
Yes, they are both terrorists. Given your scenario, they both believe enough. The diference is, in one culture, it's commonplace. In the other, it's sacreligious.

Oh, by the way, it's American.

And a Christian. I think most churches that host AA make note of that...

As to mark's last little barb my way...not worth my trouble to pick out of my skin. Context, junior...context.
 
No barb was aimed SnP's way. I am not at all surprised that his sense of self importance is so over inflated though....
 
Do you really presume to tell Muslims what they believe?

no I go by what they say, and I'm speaking of Radicals.
I know there are decent Muslims, just as there are decent Christians.

But tell me why was it the the Taliban imprisoned, and even killed that Asian
Christian group.

Radical Anything is what is bad. I don't care way religion, or no religion.

Islam's prophet, Muhammad, believed Jesus was the Messiah, Allah's anointed messenger. Allah's people (Muslims) are told to listen to Allah's messengers (Koran, 4:171; 5: 111*).

From the Muslims I know, some believe as Muhammad, did according to that, and some don't. I doesn't mean they aren't Muslim, and it doesn't mean
they are radical, but That is the way most Radicals look at it, from what I've seen.

Now about the belittling part, I'm very careful exactly how I word things (like Prof :D)
and I do ride the line at times within my own ethics, but The BS flag, I knew would probably draw your Ire, so it was in fact provocative, and accomplish
exactly what I expected.:nerd:
It just happened to be what I've experienced, and have taken from the people
I know. When I stereotype a group, it's because I believe it's the Majority,
not necessarily All, and Not a minority.
I am wrong in some cases, and I'm not above admitting it, I was trying to
light a fire under ya, to hopefully provoke you to look up some stuff, and you did.

Psychology is a powerful thing sometimes...ain't it.:cool4:

I'll lay off the subject now, and let ya cool down, I'll even admit wrong, if you need more resolution.

Merry Christmas.:beardbng:
 
Radical Anything is what is bad. I don't care way religion, or no religion....


....Merry Christmas.:beardbng:

With those two things I do agree with you catocom. Usually of all the cons here I find you to be among the most sensible and compassionate. I usually feel that your heart is "in the right place", in spite of my disagreement with your politics, but I did recently look into Tancredo and that guy honestly scares me.

This is why:

http://www.ontheissues.org/Tom_Tancredo.htm said:
Embryonic stem cell research is morally reprehensible. (May 2007)
Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
Voted YES on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
Voted YES on restricting bankruptcy rules. (Jan 2004)
We are just one kooky judge away from homosexual marriage. (Sep2007)
President can't legislate morality; but can lead on morality. (Sep 2007)
Cult of multiculturalism destructive to western civilization. (Jun 2006)
We're diversifying to death; promote AMERICAN culture. (Jun 2006)
Voted YES on Constitutionally defining marriage as one-man-one-woman.(Jul2006)
Voted YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005)
Voted YES on Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Sep 2004)
Voted YES on protecting the Pledge of Allegiance. (Sep 2004)
Voted YES on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)
Rated 7% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
Far too many criminal statutes at the federal level. (Sep 2007)
Death penalty is appropriate for heinous crimes like treason. (Sep 2007)
Opposes "hate crimes" legislation. (Sep 2007)
Voted NO on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun2000)
Voted YES on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999)
Rated 30% by CURE, indicating anti-rehabilitation crime votes. (Dec 2000)
Voted YES on prohibiting needle exchange & medical marijuana in DC. (Oct 1999)
Equal funds for abstinence as contraceptive-based education. (Sep 2007)
Tax-credited programs for Christian schooling. (Sep 2007)
Voted NO on $84 million in grants for Black and Hispanic colleges. (Mar 2006)
Voted YES on allowing school prayer during the War on Terror. (Nov 2001)
Voted NO on requiring states to test students. (May 2001)
Rated 8% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
Supports a Constitutional Amendment for school prayer. (May 1997)
Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on scheduling permitting for new oil refinieries. (Jun 2006)
Voted YES on authorizing construction of new oil refineries. (Oct 2005)
Voted YES on implementing Bush-Cheney national energy policy. (Nov 2003)
Voted NO on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)
Voted NO on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
Voted YES on deauthorizing "critical habitat" for endangered species. (Sep 2005)
Rated 5% by the LCV, indicating anti-environment votes. (Dec 2003)
No representation for DC; to do so, give it back to MD & VA. (Sep 2007)
Ok if church identifies candidates who favor its principles. (Sep 2007)
Voted NO on requiring 527s to disclose donors & activities. (Jun 2000)
Voted NO on protecting whistleblowers from employer recrimination. (Mar 2007)
Voted YES on restricting independent grassroots political committees. (Apr 2006)
Voted YES on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
Oppose mandated health insurance and universal coverage. (Sep 2007)
Ridiculous to clone people for donating organs. (May 2007)
Voted NO on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on denying non-emergency treatment for lack of Medicare co-pay.
(Feb2006)

Voted YES on limiting medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000 damages. (May 2004)
Voted NO on limited prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients. (Nov 2003)
Voted YES on subsidizing private insurance for Medicare Rx drug coverage. (Jun 2000)
Rated 22% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)
Waterboarding--simulated drowning--is not toruture. (Sep 2007)
Use Jack Bauer-like methods to protect Western civilization. (May 2007)
We are at war with Islamofascism. (Jun 2006)
Islam's basic tenets are inextricably linked to terrorism. (Jun 2006)
If nuked by Islamic terrorists, take out their holy sites. (Jun 2006)
Evil prowls this planet; defend with terrorist profiling. (Jun 2006)
Voted NO on restricting no-bid defense contracts. (Mar 2007)
Voted YES on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant. (Sep 2006)
Voted YES on continuing intelligence gathering without civil oversight. (Apr 2006)
I'm not going to aid any more immigration. (Nov 2007)
Amnesty is worst possible public policy you can ever have. (Sep 2007)
Enough is enough: timeout on LEGAL immigration. (Jun 2007)
Keep law that bars immigrants from running for president. (May 2007)
Our society is intoxicated with multiculturalism. (Jun 2006)
No "sexual orientation" in Employment Non-Discrimination Act. (Sep 2007)
Voted NO on restricting employer interference in union organizing. (Mar 2007)
Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)
Voted YES on zero-funding OSHA's Ergonomics Rules instead of $4.5B. (Mar 2001)
Private Social Security accounts needed to end deficit. (Oct 2007)
Voted YES on reducing tax payments on Social Security benefits. (Jul 2000)
Voted NO on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox. (May 1999)
Rated 30% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record. (Dec 2003)

Voted YES on increasing fines for indecent broadcasting. (Feb 2005)
Voted YES on allowing telephone monopolies to offer Internet access. (Feb 2002)
Iraq is a battlefield in war with radical Islam. (Sep 2007)
Stop restricting army with rules of engagement. (Aug 2007)
If Islamic terrorists threaten nukes, we nuke Mecca & Medina. (Aug 2007)
Muslims attack us because it's a dictate of their religion. (May 2007)
Voted NO on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers. (Jun 2006)

(Things I see as more important in bold, and critically important in red)

Tell me does nobody else see the pattern here?
 
With those two things I do agree with you catocom. Usually of all the cons here I find you to be among the most sensible and compassionate. I usually feel that your heart is "in the right place", in spite of my disagreement with your politics, but I did recently look into Tancredo and that guy honestly scares me.

This is why:



(Things I see as more important in bold, and critically important in red)

Tell me does nobody else see the pattern here?

what it doesn't say is how many of those isuses are amendments to a more Main bill.
You can't pick and choose issues without looking at the whole bill.
You know how it works there man.
That's why the gov as a whole needs to be revamped.
 
Merry Christmas fits the day.

Happy Holidays fits the "season". Thanksgiving, Hannukah, Christmas, Eid al-Adha, Kwanza (*snicker*), New Years.

Seasons Greetings means you are unwilling to commit.
 
Merry Christmas fits the day.

Happy Holidays fits the "season". Thanksgiving, Hannukah, Christmas, Eid al-Adha, Kwanza (*snicker*), New Years.

Seasons Greetings means you are unwilling to commit.

OK, just for you Gonz!

Happy December Jackass!
 
Back
Top